메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제16권 제3호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
371 - 389 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose In this paper, we examine prevailing venture investment contract methods employed by the venture capital community in Korea in order to assess the extent to which they are actually beneficial for developing and nurturing early stage start-ups. Design/Methodology/Approach We evaluate the validity of SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity), a recently adopted investment contract modality in Korea by comparing its position relative to RCPS or Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock which is established as the most prevailing investment contract method. In doing so, we analyze data on Venture Capital investment contract during the period from 2015~2019 in Korea, through the conduct and qualitative assessment of multiple case studies of early start-ups. Findings We find that the venture investment community in Korea has been relying disproportionately on the RCPS as the prefered venture investment contract method, which, however, works against the interests and success of the start-up by imposing too much risk on the entrepreneur and binding him/her to repay the invested capital at the expense of the longer-term viability of the firm. Research Implications The implication of our study is that striking a good balance between the investor’s risk reduction in redemption and the sustainability of the start-up operation is the key to the successful design and implementation of the institutional framework for venture investment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0