메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(Seoul National University) (Seoul National University) (Seoul National University)
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第55卷 第4號(通卷 第250號)
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    According to the Restitution of Excess Rebuilding Gains Act of 2006, reconstructed apartments in the three Gangnam districts are believed to be a source of the instability in the Korean housing market. For better social equity, the act aims to retrieve the excess of the price increase accruing to the reconstruction association from the reconstruction of the apartments; thus this study attempts to quantitatively present the excessive price increase for the apartments relative to non-reconstructed apartments. Specifically, it employs a difference-in-difference model to compare the price increase between the reconstructed and non-reconstructed apartments using 10-year data of the market housing values for all 420 apartments in the three districts in which repeated sales pairs are present. The model finds that the excessive increase is insignificant in the districts of Gangnam and Songpa, whereas in Seocho, it is around 10%. Then, as the findings are incon\-sistent across the districts, this study conducts a further analysis with regard to the basic assumption of difference- in-dif\-ference analysis such that between the compared subjects, characteristics other than the reconstruction should be simi\-lar. For the analysis, it excludes 11 legal dongs, including Yangjae and Woomyeon, in which reconstructed apartments are not located; instead, the sample consists of the other 20 dongs that have both reconstructed and non-reconstructed apart\-ments. The analysis presents no differing results for Songpa and Gangnam while for Seocho, the excessive increase turns out to be unidentifiable. The finding of no excessive increase for apartments in all the three Gangnam districts implies that the reconstruction contribution levy possibly distorts social equity. Thus, this study recommends a way of improving the restitution system to mitigate the inequity of the reconstruction contribution levy, which is imposed only on the reconstruction association.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-539-001140672