메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(동국대학교 - 서울)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제31권 제3집(통권 제71집)
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    Today, crime has become more intelligent and brutal, making it difficult to detect crimes, and thus the need for scientific evidence in criminal investigations and criminal proofs has increased. In most countries, DNA information is used as an important evidence for investigation. However, many argue that the collection of DNA identification information under the DNA law can violate individual privacy and other personal rights, and that it goes against the principle of presumption of innocence and the principle of excessive prohibition under the Constitution. However, the Constitutional Court confirmed that the collection of DNA identification information under the DNA Act was not a violation of the Constitution.
    In response, this paper reviewed the purpose of the DNA Act and discussed the target crimes and persons subject to DNA information, and argued for the expansion of its use. In other words, the collection of DNA identification information under the DNA Act does not treat the person subject to collection as a criminal. There is not much invasion of privacy in that it is only collected in terms of collecting administrative information and used as data to identify criminals in the event of a crime occurs. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the collection target of DNA identification information to suspects of all crimes except minor crimes, regardless of whether they are arrested or not, and to make them database when the sentence of imprisonment or confinement is confirmed. However, it is necessary to prepare strict regulations on the management and utilization of DNA identification information in order to minimize concerns about privacy infringement by collecting them.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-001156911