지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: Demands are recently rising for the securement of procedural justification of policy decision-making. This study aims to improve the procedure of making a decision to expand health insurance benefit package from the perspective of building a social consensus. Methods: Major priority principles were firstly derived through literature search. Weights for such principles were calculated through an analytic hierarchy process, based upon the survey conducted for the health policy experts. Priority for 11 non-covered services was assessed by applying the weights as above to the results of the questionnaire survey targeted at people including members of related committees or societies. Results: Weights for priority principles were in the order of 'severity/urgency (0.428)', 'cost-effectiveness (0.318)', 'substitutability (0.164),' and 'accountability (0.090)'. What was obtained by applying these weights to the results of the questionnaire survey was considerably in line with what health experts classified those items into 3 groups depending on their own judgement of service necessity (consistent with 9 services out of 11). Conclusion: Results of the study are suggestive as to how far a brief assessment by experts could be utilized in case there are constraints on time and expenses in implementing all the process to secure procedural justification. Various attempts and endeavors need to be made to secure procedural justification that will not mar efficiency of decision-making in the days to come.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
World Health Organization / 2008 / World health report 2008
Jeong HS / 2013 / Study on estimation of spending to expand NHI benefit package as well as improvement of NHI payment method and price contract system
Lee KS / 2012 / Financing and delivering health care / Gyechuk Munwhasa
Jo JG / 2008 / Priority setting in health policy in major developed countries and reform of the benefit scheme in Korea / Proceedings of the 40th Congress of Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management; 2008 May 23; Seoul, Korea
Cumming J / 1994 / Core services and priority-setting: the New Zealand experience / Health Policy 29(1):41~60
Jeong HS / 2013 / Study on estimation of spending to expand NHI benefit package as well as improvement of NHI payment method and price contract system
Lee KS / 2012 / Financing and delivering health care / Gyechuk Munwhasa
Jo JG / 2008 / Priority setting in health policy in major developed countries and reform of the benefit scheme in Korea / Proceedings of the 40th Congress of Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management; 2008 May 23; Seoul, Korea
Cumming J / 1994 / Core services and priority-setting: the New Zealand experience / Health Policy 29(1):41~60
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0