인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 367 - 389 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
“Why does Macbeth kill Duncan?” has been a dominant question of the readers of Macbeth, and traditionally the play has been read as a morality tale about the perils of ambition. But The aim of this paper is to shift the question to “Why Macbeth can not refrain from killing Duncan?” This article draws attention to the striking fact that, in killing king Duncan, Macbeth acts against the ethical and pragmatic considerations that constitute his decisive better judgment. This suggests the possibility that Macbeth’s much discussed ambition can be understood as a subset of the broader theme of akrasia.
Acrasia is a kind of mental condition in which an agent is unable to perform an action he knows to be right. This study suggests two interrelated explanations of Macbeth’s akrasia. First, Macbeth’s connection to the motivational conditions of his knowledge is shallow, and he suffers from his weakness of will. Second, Macbeth’s incontinence is habitual because his weak connection to the conative dimension of his knowledge prohibits him from appealing to techniques of skilled resistance. Finally, his habitual lack of self-control renders him vulnerable to Lady Macbeth’s taunts, which not only depletes the motivation supporting his better judgment but also prevents him from giving full deliberative weight to his better judgment.
In conclusion, while Macbeth, taken to his rational nature, knows well that he ought not to kill Duncan, he, led by his specific emotional tendencies, does not know that he ought not to kill Duncan. In the case of Macbeth, knowledge is not enough to prevent his murder.
Acrasia is a kind of mental condition in which an agent is unable to perform an action he knows to be right. This study suggests two interrelated explanations of Macbeth’s akrasia. First, Macbeth’s connection to the motivational conditions of his knowledge is shallow, and he suffers from his weakness of will. Second, Macbeth’s incontinence is habitual because his weak connection to the conative dimension of his knowledge prohibits him from appealing to techniques of skilled resistance. Finally, his habitual lack of self-control renders him vulnerable to Lady Macbeth’s taunts, which not only depletes the motivation supporting his better judgment but also prevents him from giving full deliberative weight to his better judgment.
In conclusion, while Macbeth, taken to his rational nature, knows well that he ought not to kill Duncan, he, led by his specific emotional tendencies, does not know that he ought not to kill Duncan. In the case of Macbeth, knowledge is not enough to prevent his murder.
#아크라시아
#의지박약
#자제력 없음
#최선의 판단
#지식
#akrasia
#weakness of will
#incontinence
#better judgment
#knowledge
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-840-001295876