메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이형식 (고려대학교)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第152輯
발행연도
2020.9
수록면
467 - 506 (40page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2020.9.152.467

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Regulations regarding courts, such as their establishment, abolishment, precinct, and alteration, were enacted by Japanese law, whereas these items were determined by Chosen’s governor-general. the boundary between legal authority and administrative authority, effected by the governor-general in colonized Chosen, was fluid, and this irrevocably posed many problems such as matters of independence of jurisdiction and guarantees of law bureaucrats’ stable position and their treatment in general. Meanwhile, Chosen initiated its own juridical system and suggested different legal interpretations; this became a threat to Japan. Thus, judicial unification became Japan’s mission. this paper aims to discover the relationship within different legal circles, such as Chosen lawyers and Japanese lawyers, Imperial Japan (the colony) and the Government-General of Chosen (the colonized), and administrative and the judicial system.
the “Attempted Murder of the Governor-General Terauchi” raised an issue related to judicial independence in Chosen. Later, this event affected the movement for stable positions guaranteed to law bureaucrats and legal circles and Kurotomi’s legislation of the Court Composition Act in Chosen. Kuratomi became one of the most fervent activists for judicial unification and its application to the Chosen court.
However, diverging interests among different political powers were conflicted over the implementation of the Court Composition Act. First, the Chosen Bar Association supported the unification of judicial institutions to resolve the delayed workloads related to courts and for the independence of the jurisdictional institution. Chosen legal officials joined this movement to problematize their treatment and guarantee their status. Their voices were raised with the assistance of Japan’s party system. The political party had been a major supporter of judicial unification since 1918. Hence, the movement for the Court Composition Act reached its peak during Hamaguchi’s cabinet, when party politics and political strife were in the spotlight. Nonetheless, the extra-territories were not easy to homogenize. There were still too many obstacles and different self-interested voices. In the late Pacific War (1941-1945), even after the unification of administrative institutions between the metropole and the colonies and partial suffrage had been guaranteed, judicial unification never came to fruition until the war ended because “Chosen is in a unique condition” and “there were possibilities of the masses rioting.” In effect, the authority of the governor-general of Chosen, a de facto minister of the colonial administration, still remained in the realm of jurisdiction, employment, and general tradition. After August 15, 1945, as another authoritarian cabinet replaced the governor-general of Chosen, the independence of jurisdiction remained an unsolved problem for a long time as a legacy of the colonial period, which is an important matter that Korean society still needs to resolve.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1910년대 일본의 사법통일문제
Ⅲ. 1920년 초 · 중기 일본의 사법통일문제
Ⅳ. 2대 정당내각 시기의 사법통일문제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0