지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.10
- 수록면
- 35 - 47 (13page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Takeshi Hamashita, a leading Japanese scholar who sought to grasp Asia in diverse regional relations, conceived the modern era of East Asia by conceptualizing the traditional relationship between East Asia and the East Asian region as a tribute system in his hesitation, The tribute System and Modern Asia. In East Asia, the traditional tributary system was formed as a co-existence method, which meant the interrelationship in which multi-cultural networks operated with a complex regional relationship, not a single center. What is meaningful in Hamashita"s logical structure is the deployment of a third port beyond the concept of binomial confrontation, which is an attempt beyond the dual alternative perception of Quantum choice. And this medium is the network. He said that the history of East Asia since the mid-19th century can be understood by the formation of a field network in Asia, which is different from the modern East Asian history of Europeanization and confrontation with Europe. The principle of wide-area order in Asia, which is different from that of modern countries, needed a wide-area merchant network, and this was the driving force of modern Asia.
This article examined the status of Busan by using Hamashita"s view that the network between the city and the city, which opened in the waters of Northeast Asia, is the formation of a network of open port networks. Many studies have been conducted, either Busan Research or Busan Studies, which reviewed the results of this study and checked the deficiencies in the conventional study from the external perspective of the open port network. Since the Joseon Dynasty, Busan has provided a space called "倭館" for Japanese trade. After the opening of the port in 1876, Waegwan (Waegwan) was transformed into a Japanese land and remained until before liberation. As such, from the perspective of the network, Busan is historically closely related to Japan. This is an important factor in identifying Busan Studies or Busan personality. However, since modern times, Chinese and Westerners have also visited and resided in Busan Port, in addition to the Japanese. Although the lack of data has not activated the relevant research, this is a clear fact. The achievements of Asian researchers such as Ryota Ishikawa disprove this. The activities of a Chinese merchant in Northeast Asia and the establishment of a settlement of the Qing Dynasty in Busan are typical examples. What is noteworthy here is that the initial Busan burn also came from Japan. This shows that one important axis connecting the open port network in Northeast Asia was the network caused by burns. Japanese occupation after the video due to decrease the number of Chinese since, and working class to find a job of Busan, Korea, but expand further as the advent of the video is an open portCompare favorably to show the network.
The Japanese occupation of Busan for entry to the continent as the entrance of Japan. It was a crowded place where people came by Busan Shimonoseki Ferry and tried to head for Manchuria. Busan Station, built near the port of Busan, was built earlier to transport them to Manchuria. During this period, Busan was actively used as a port for Japan"s advancement into the continent along with Najin(羅津) and Cheongjin(淸津). As the function of Busan Port and the occupations of residents were defined by Japan, Busan Port seems to be out of the existing open port network, but it still functions as a physical network and as a mediated port of human network of human movement. After liberation and through the Korean War, Busan became a city of refugees in its traditional form, namely the colonial legacy that Japan left behind. On top of the traces left by the Japanese, fault lines due to the devastation of the war were piled up, and the birth of the marine industry began with modernization. Busan personality was sprouting right here.
This article examined the status of Busan by using Hamashita"s view that the network between the city and the city, which opened in the waters of Northeast Asia, is the formation of a network of open port networks. Many studies have been conducted, either Busan Research or Busan Studies, which reviewed the results of this study and checked the deficiencies in the conventional study from the external perspective of the open port network. Since the Joseon Dynasty, Busan has provided a space called "倭館" for Japanese trade. After the opening of the port in 1876, Waegwan (Waegwan) was transformed into a Japanese land and remained until before liberation. As such, from the perspective of the network, Busan is historically closely related to Japan. This is an important factor in identifying Busan Studies or Busan personality. However, since modern times, Chinese and Westerners have also visited and resided in Busan Port, in addition to the Japanese. Although the lack of data has not activated the relevant research, this is a clear fact. The achievements of Asian researchers such as Ryota Ishikawa disprove this. The activities of a Chinese merchant in Northeast Asia and the establishment of a settlement of the Qing Dynasty in Busan are typical examples. What is noteworthy here is that the initial Busan burn also came from Japan. This shows that one important axis connecting the open port network in Northeast Asia was the network caused by burns. Japanese occupation after the video due to decrease the number of Chinese since, and working class to find a job of Busan, Korea, but expand further as the advent of the video is an open portCompare favorably to show the network.
The Japanese occupation of Busan for entry to the continent as the entrance of Japan. It was a crowded place where people came by Busan Shimonoseki Ferry and tried to head for Manchuria. Busan Station, built near the port of Busan, was built earlier to transport them to Manchuria. During this period, Busan was actively used as a port for Japan"s advancement into the continent along with Najin(羅津) and Cheongjin(淸津). As the function of Busan Port and the occupations of residents were defined by Japan, Busan Port seems to be out of the existing open port network, but it still functions as a physical network and as a mediated port of human network of human movement. After liberation and through the Korean War, Busan became a city of refugees in its traditional form, namely the colonial legacy that Japan left behind. On top of the traces left by the Japanese, fault lines due to the devastation of the war were piled up, and the birth of the marine industry began with modernization. Busan personality was sprouting right here.
목차
서론
본론
결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
해방 직후 조선 거주 일본인들의 귀환과 부산항
동북아 문화연구
2021 .06
-
시인 유치환과 부산의 장소성
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .07
-
임권택 감독의 시선을 통해 (재)발견되는 부산의 로컬리티
동북아 문화연구
2017 .12
-
부산항 항만서비스산업 육성전략
해양비즈니스
2019 .01
-
한국전쟁기 유엔군 군수사령부 편성과 부산항 - 1950년 해상물류시스템 구축 과정을 중심으로 -
동북아 문화연구
2022 .03
-
부산항 컨테이너화물의 항만물류가지역경제에 미치는 파급효과
무역연구
2015 .01
-
일본 문학작품과 관광콘텐츠
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .10
-
빅데이터 분석을 통한 향후 부산관광 전략에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2020 .01
-
Balanced Regional Policy in Korea and Policy Recommendations for Busan Financial Center
경제연구
2020 .01
-
한일협력의 새로운 패러다임의 모색 : 부산시 지방정부 차원의 한일협력을 중심으로
정치정보연구
2016 .02
-
근현대 부산의 도시 형성과 해역 : 이주 현상에 주목하여
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2021 .07
-
Colorful Busan
한국관광레저학회 학술발표대회
2017 .06
-
부산금융중심지 발전을 위한 제도･정책적 제언
경영연구
2021 .01
-
부산의 관광지 이미지 인식에 대한 탐색적 연구: 외국인 관광객의 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 중심으로
관광레저연구
2022 .10
-
부산 해양·수산 관광지에 대한 중국관광객의 기대 및 만족도 연구
수산경영론집
2018 .01
-
부산항만공사의 중장기 성장전략
해양비즈니스
2016 .01
-
동태적 변이할당분석을 활용한 부산시 관광산업 구조적 특성 분석 연구
호텔리조트연구
2021 .08
-
부산지역 해운․항만산업의지역경제 파급효과 재조명
무역연구
2015 .01
-
동아시아 근대 지식네트워크의 형성 -동아시아 근대 출판의 성립과 이동을 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .07
-
식민도시 부산의 서점 연구 : 1910년대 『부산일보』의 서점 광고란을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2016 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-910-001582986