인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 130 (130page)
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
This report examines how the Republic of Korea as a society has been responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Major factors that contributed to its success include 1) prompt testing for diagnosis, 2) timely tracing of potential contacts, and 3) proactive organization of triage system. Such measures are implemented at a number of different situations when other conditions and prerequisites were already established or under development. Actions taken by the central government that may have significantly helped mitigating the impact of Covid19 include:
1) Collaborative relationship with other international organizations and partners for sharing information bilaterally, which may have given more time to prepare for the virus crossing the border.
2) Transparency in delivering information. Timely release of the information on the newly confirmed cases and their possible contacts helped reducing anxiety among the public.
3) Experts and professionals assisted to fight against the misinformation spreading in the public.
4) The responding agency had flexibility in accepting new knowledge and applying it to the response activities.
5) Contact tracing combined with rapid diagnostic capability(drive in testing booth) were the key components which comes with sacrifice of contact tracers, hundreds of them. By identifying close contacts and confirming positive at the same time reduces the chances of infection spreading further.
6) Social distancing was practiced by the public both voluntarily and mandatorily. A whole of society response to this pandemic has been emphasized as a critical approach by a number of examples. Sustainable mitigation measures are needed to prepare for the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> wave of COVID-19. Hospital infection control is still a top priority : risk of group infection and affects the most vulnerable to this virus. Response workforce’s health and safety is utmost important; loss of workforce in healthcare setting will lead to withdraw of some of the progress made in the public health area.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지1) Collaborative relationship with other international organizations and partners for sharing information bilaterally, which may have given more time to prepare for the virus crossing the border.
2) Transparency in delivering information. Timely release of the information on the newly confirmed cases and their possible contacts helped reducing anxiety among the public.
3) Experts and professionals assisted to fight against the misinformation spreading in the public.
4) The responding agency had flexibility in accepting new knowledge and applying it to the response activities.
5) Contact tracing combined with rapid diagnostic capability(drive in testing booth) were the key components which comes with sacrifice of contact tracers, hundreds of them. By identifying close contacts and confirming positive at the same time reduces the chances of infection spreading further.
6) Social distancing was practiced by the public both voluntarily and mandatorily. A whole of society response to this pandemic has been emphasized as a critical approach by a number of examples. Sustainable mitigation measures are needed to prepare for the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> wave of COVID-19. Hospital infection control is still a top priority : risk of group infection and affects the most vulnerable to this virus. Response workforce’s health and safety is utmost important; loss of workforce in healthcare setting will lead to withdraw of some of the progress made in the public health area.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- [표지]
- [국문요약]
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 연구방법
- Ⅲ. 연구결과
- Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
- [Abstract]
- [목차]
- 표 목차
- 그림 목차
- [Ⅰ. 서론]
- 1. 연구 배경
- 2. 연구 목적
- [Ⅱ. 연구방법 및 추진체계]
- 1. 연구방법
- 2. 연구추진체계
- [Ⅲ. 대한민국 보건정책 및 보건의료체계와 코로나19]
- 1. 한국의 코로나19 대응 개괄: 단계별 전략 및 방식
- 2. 코로나19 위기변화에 따른 주체별 대응 요약
- 3. 한국 신종감염병 위기 대응 중앙 거버넌스와 보건의료체계
- 4. 지역사회의 코로나19 대응체계: 서울시를 중심으로
- 5. 국제적 기준인 IHR 이행 쟁점과 한국의 경험
- [Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언]
- 1. 한국의 코로나19 대응의 신속성 및 유연성
- 2. 전문가 집단(일종의 ‘방역지원 군대’) 양성
- 3. 필수 보건의료서비스 연속성 지속
- 4. 의료인, 역학조사관 등 대응인력의 확보
- 5. IHR 이행 모니터링 및 현장 감시체계
- 6. 코로나19 대응을 위한 실험실 역량강화
- 7. 총평
- [참고문헌]
- [부록]
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-349-000055734