인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 88 - 117 (30page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
Branch selection is a process in which officers who have been trained with a great deal of time and cost are able to exercise their abilities, and receive the opportunity for self-realization. It is also an opportunity for the Army to develop its branches.
However, branch selection actually occurs when cadets are not aware of the field situation. Furthermore, branch selection is currently based solely on fragmentary education by branch officers. Therefore, it is difficult for cadets to properly consider their aptitude and abilities.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to provide a guide for branch selection for the new generation of cadets and policy implications for the army as a whole.
This study was conducted in two phases.
In the first phase, two surveys examined the criteria for selecting branches and the perceptions of each branch, and quantitatively analyzed the priorities and preferences among the cadets through the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).
In the second phase, the branch perceptions of field experts were investigated and the differences in perception between cadets and experts were verified as statistically significant through ANalysis Of VAriance(ANOVA). Also, implications were presented by comparing the perceptions of cadets who hava no experience in each branch with those of field experts.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지However, branch selection actually occurs when cadets are not aware of the field situation. Furthermore, branch selection is currently based solely on fragmentary education by branch officers. Therefore, it is difficult for cadets to properly consider their aptitude and abilities.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to provide a guide for branch selection for the new generation of cadets and policy implications for the army as a whole.
This study was conducted in two phases.
In the first phase, two surveys examined the criteria for selecting branches and the perceptions of each branch, and quantitatively analyzed the priorities and preferences among the cadets through the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).
In the second phase, the branch perceptions of field experts were investigated and the differences in perception between cadets and experts were verified as statistically significant through ANalysis Of VAriance(ANOVA). Also, implications were presented by comparing the perceptions of cadets who hava no experience in each branch with those of field experts.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- ABSTRACT
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. AHP 분석 기법
- Ⅲ. 병과분류 제도
- Ⅳ. 실증분석
- Ⅴ. 결론
- 〈참고문헌〉