인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
An article on the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ of J. Mark Ramseyer, Mitsubishi professor of Japanese legal studies at Harvard Law School, made a fuss at the beginning of 2021. Ramseyer’s attack on the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ has been clearly established as a case to be withdrawn for academic infidelity by the global academic community within a short period of a month or so.
Ramseyer’s writing, which was one of a series of articles on his racial-class hate theory that emerged to the fore in the late 2010s, is the declaration of his own identity as a the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denalist under the influence of the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism in Japan waging the ‘history war’. Ramseyer’s claim that forced mobilization and sexual slavery are simply untrue is the same as the conventional argument of the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism in Japan since the late 1990s, and is only a flimsy slang or hope that can be used only within Japan. Ramseyer’s failure is a proof of that fact.
Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism even leaded by the Japanese government will soon end. Rather, amid the bizarre silence of the Japanese media, it is even questioned whether the entire Japanese society is becoming an ‘island of obstinacy and confirmation bias.’ In order to properly solve the the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ issue, and to establish its proper place in the history, the Korean society, together with the international community including Japanese citizens, must make more intense efforts.
Ramseyer’s writing, which was one of a series of articles on his racial-class hate theory that emerged to the fore in the late 2010s, is the declaration of his own identity as a the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denalist under the influence of the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism in Japan waging the ‘history war’. Ramseyer’s claim that forced mobilization and sexual slavery are simply untrue is the same as the conventional argument of the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism in Japan since the late 1990s, and is only a flimsy slang or hope that can be used only within Japan. Ramseyer’s failure is a proof of that fact.
Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ denialism even leaded by the Japanese government will soon end. Rather, amid the bizarre silence of the Japanese media, it is even questioned whether the entire Japanese society is becoming an ‘island of obstinacy and confirmation bias.’ In order to properly solve the the Japanese military ‘comfort women’ issue, and to establish its proper place in the history, the Korean society, together with the international community including Japanese citizens, must make more intense efforts.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-905-001774352
