인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of South Korea that ordered the defendant Japanese companies to pay compensation to former forced laborers gravely jolted the very foundation upon which all the legal understandings are perceived, among the ruling elite of Japan, to be constructed in regard to the relations with South Korea. The Japanese Government is adamant in rejecting the rulings, and leading experts in Japan are highly critical of the recent attitude of the Korea’s highest judicial organ on issues linked to the era of Japan’s colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula. From my perspective, however, these decisions are an indication that the Euro-centric evolutionary history of international law in which colonial rule is considered a thing of the past and the past wrongs are prone to oblivion is radically challenged as the active remembering contributes to the construction of narratives that present the past as a series of injustices. The current inclination in the Korean judiciary promoted by memory of injustices is clearly toward remembering and righting past wrongs in the present. In this essay, I will develop this perspective after portraying the domestic development in Japan regarding the interpretation of the Claims Agreement to show that Japan’s ‘goalposts’ have been moved from the original one to waive the State’s right of diplomatic protection to one to eviscerate the individual’s right to be satisfied, then onto the most recent one to extinguish the individual’s procedural right to sue.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-361-001839592
