메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승윤 (홍익대학교)
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제16권 제6호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
651 - 667 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines the effects of perceived appraisal purpose, procedural justice, and attributional behavior on ratee’s accountability in the context of multi-rater performance appraisal system. In addition, this study reveals how the extent of ratee accountability differs depending on the type of raters (supervisor or peer). Design/Methodology/Approach A sample of 153 employees in 8 firms implementing multi-rater performance appraisal system was used, and hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to test the hypotheses. Findings Ratees reported a higher level of accountability to supervisor than to peers. Ratee perception of procedural justice was positively associated with accountability to supervisor, peer, and general accountability. In addition, ratee’s external attribution behavior (i.e., attribution to supervisor monitoring) was found to enhance the level of accountability to peers. Research Implications The main results indicate the importance of procedural justice when designing and implementing multi-rater performance appraisal system. Lack of an appropriate degree of supervisor monitoring, one of the external attribution factors, is associated with one’s level of accountability to peers. This implies that one’s motivation to maintain and protect self-image and a sense of self-esteem is at work in the multi-rater performance appraisal settings. Furthermore, this study takes the perspective of ratee, a critical yet under-explored aspect in the accountability literature.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0