지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第130號
- 발행연도
- 2021.10
- 수록면
- 243 - 258 (16page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2021.10.130.243
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Different languages have the same way of cognition of the same concept, but also have many differences. There are also ambiguities for words with the same conceptual meaning. The similarities will help people understand this language faster and easier, and the existence of differences and ambiguities also brings many barriers to understanding. Therefore, it is very necessary for people to understand the language to compare words in different languages under the same concept and find the similarities and differences between them.
Regarding the similarities and differences between the cognitive existence of languages, this article chooses to analyze the semantic map. This paper sorts out and analyzes the data of dictionaries, corpora and related dictionary websites, and sums up 36 different meanings in three languages. After comparing and analyzing these 36 different sense items, 28 sense items were determined as the base points of the semantic map, and the semantic map was drawn on this basis. Through the comparison of semantic maps, it can be seen that in the three languages, the meaning of ‘玩耍’ diverges outwards, thus forming numerous meanings. Among the three languages, Korean has the strongest divergence and produces the most meanings. The semantic divergence of the three languages also has completely different expansion paths.
Through this article, you can have a preliminary understanding of the commonalities and differences between languages. For learners of English, Chinese and Korean, they can also have a deeper understanding of the three languages, and they can use more accurate vocabulary when choosing words and making sentences.
Regarding the similarities and differences between the cognitive existence of languages, this article chooses to analyze the semantic map. This paper sorts out and analyzes the data of dictionaries, corpora and related dictionary websites, and sums up 36 different meanings in three languages. After comparing and analyzing these 36 different sense items, 28 sense items were determined as the base points of the semantic map, and the semantic map was drawn on this basis. Through the comparison of semantic maps, it can be seen that in the three languages, the meaning of ‘玩耍’ diverges outwards, thus forming numerous meanings. Among the three languages, Korean has the strongest divergence and produces the most meanings. The semantic divergence of the three languages also has completely different expansion paths.
Through this article, you can have a preliminary understanding of the commonalities and differences between languages. For learners of English, Chinese and Korean, they can also have a deeper understanding of the three languages, and they can use more accurate vocabulary when choosing words and making sentences.
목차
1. 緖論
2. ‘玩’、‘play’以及‘놀다’的分析
3. 語義地圖的繪制
4. 結論
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
차세대 재미동포단체의 탐색적 유형화 및 분석
재외한인연구
2021 .02
-
어순 연구성과를 활용한 중국어 단문 독해교육 방안
중국어교육과연구
2016 .06
-
語序類型學視角下的方位後置詞硏究
중국어교육과연구
2018 .06
-
得意忘象与得意取象—王弼与茶山易学比较
양명학
2018 .08
-
한국어 텍스트의 어휘 다양도와 어휘 밀도 분석
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
한국인 대학생 학습자의 학문목적 영어 구술 프레젠테이션에 나타난 어휘 복잡성 분석: 숙달도와 성별에 따른 차이를 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2019 .11
-
An Analysis of Lexical Elements in High School English Textbooks
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2020 .10
-
「韓語史與漢語史的對話」會議報導
한국어사 연구
2018 .03
-
韓語史與漢語史的對話Ⅱ : 會議報導
한국어사 연구
2019 .03
-
Applying Pym’s Typology Of Translation Solutions To Korean-English Text Analysis: A Preliminary Study To Use The Typology In An Undergraduate Translation Class
T&I REVIEW
2022 .12
-
Lexical frames in L2 writing development: A longitudinal study
영어교과교육
2020 .01
-
중국 초등학교 『語文』 교과서 음절별 고빈도어휘 분석 및 교육적 활용 모색
중국어교육과연구
2019 .12
-
Facilitating Lexical Access in Chinese L2 Students
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
경영학 논문의 어휘묶음 비교 분석
담화와인지
2021 .08
-
東亞唐詩學的史料範圍與研究視角
연민학지
2024 .02
-
신문 빅데이터를 활용한 현대국어 어휘 변화의 탐색
언어와 정보사회
2024 .03
-
조선 전기(15~16세기) 완상(玩賞)의 분위기와 청자 화분의 재현
한국중세고고학
2021 .12
-
국어 어휘론의 연구 대상으로서 어휘 범주와 어휘 범주 분류의 체계화
한말연구
2021 .12
-
일본인 소녀 요코가 가진 양의적 의미에 대한 고찰
일본문화연구
2018 .01
-
淺析 《世說新語》 “在”字句句法結構及其特點 : 以與 《論語》 《孟子》 《呂氏春秋》 《史記》 的比較爲中心
중국어문학논집
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-820-002169202