지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第129號
- 발행연도
- 2021.8
- 수록면
- 35 - 57 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2021.8.129.35
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The modern Chinese verbal quantifiers ‘Fan·Tong·Bian’ have a unique function of expressing detailed situation. In order to find the origin of this function, this study goes back to the Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties Period, the period in which verbal quantifiers occurs and develops. This paper figure out what the difference is. This work is carried out through comparison with general classifier ‘Guo’, used at the time.
In ‘Fan·Tong·Bian’, the typically combined verbs are different, and there are also differences in the combined numeral. The difference was attributed to the persistence of the meaning of the verb, which is the content word, before these quatifiers were grammaticalized. Although there are differences in specific content, these properties are basically consistent with the modern Chinese ‘Fan·Tong·Bian’ and were named "Youse" properties. The distinction between "Youse" and "Wuse" has existed since the beginning of the period, and this difference is different from the "Guo", which functions only as a measure word, while the "Youse" verbal quantifier provides information on the realization method and state of act.
In modern Chinese, "Fan" and "Tong" form the fixed form of "YiFan" and "YiTong" and the meaning of "a bout" or "on a large scale" based on the property of detailed situation of "accumulation". Depending on the context, "YiFan" indicates an active meaning and "YiTong" indicates a passive meaning, giving the speaker"s subjectivity. It is also the goal of this paper to elucidate the origin of this unique function. As a result of the review, it was confirmed that the above-mentioned functions did not exist during the Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties Period, the early stage of the occurrence of verbal quantifiers. From this, it was inferred that the function of expressing the subjectivity of verbal quantifiers was acquired in the process of long-term operation and development of verbal quantifiers.
In ‘Fan·Tong·Bian’, the typically combined verbs are different, and there are also differences in the combined numeral. The difference was attributed to the persistence of the meaning of the verb, which is the content word, before these quatifiers were grammaticalized. Although there are differences in specific content, these properties are basically consistent with the modern Chinese ‘Fan·Tong·Bian’ and were named "Youse" properties. The distinction between "Youse" and "Wuse" has existed since the beginning of the period, and this difference is different from the "Guo", which functions only as a measure word, while the "Youse" verbal quantifier provides information on the realization method and state of act.
In modern Chinese, "Fan" and "Tong" form the fixed form of "YiFan" and "YiTong" and the meaning of "a bout" or "on a large scale" based on the property of detailed situation of "accumulation". Depending on the context, "YiFan" indicates an active meaning and "YiTong" indicates a passive meaning, giving the speaker"s subjectivity. It is also the goal of this paper to elucidate the origin of this unique function. As a result of the review, it was confirmed that the above-mentioned functions did not exist during the Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties Period, the early stage of the occurrence of verbal quantifiers. From this, it was inferred that the function of expressing the subjectivity of verbal quantifiers was acquired in the process of long-term operation and development of verbal quantifiers.
목차
1. 서론
2. 위진남북조 시기 동량사 ‘番·通·遍’과 ‘過’ 비교
3. ‘有色’동량사와 ‘情態’동량사 비교
4. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국어 情態 표현 동량구의 통시적 고찰
중국어문학논집
2023 .06
-
『齊民要術』動量詞使用情況考察
중국문화연구
2019 .02
-
영어와 한국어의 양화사 의미와 중의성 연구
영어영문학
2019 .05
-
Syntax of Aspect and Event Quantifiers: the Case of Mandarin
언어와언어학
2020 .01
-
수량어 ‘만큼’ 구성의 의미 통사적 기능 연구
어문연구
2019 .01
-
The Syntax of Quantifier All : Q-Stranding
언어학 연구
2019 .01
-
Quantifier-Float or Pied-Piping?
현대문법연구
2019 .01
-
現代漢語不定量詞‘一點’的引申途徑
중국어문학논집
2024 .10
-
A Lexical Approach to Quantifiers
영어영문학21
2016 .01
-
한국어 유동양화사의 부사어적 성격으로 인한 의미·화용적 영향에 관한 연구
언어과학
2021 .11
-
Experimental L2 Semantics/Pragmatics of Scalar Quantifiers: An ERP Study
영어학연구
2020 .01
-
Notes on English quantifier: floating vs. stranding
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2023 .05
-
More notes on the English floating/stranding quantifier
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2023 .10
-
On Movement
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
Imperatives, Interrogatives and Quantifiers in Korean
언어와 정보
2020 .07
-
On the Asymmetry of Quantifer and Non-quantifier Genitives in English Nominative Structure
언어와 정보
2017 .02
-
The Quest for Simplicity of Quantifier Scope and Labeling Algorithm
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2017 .05
-
论动量短语与宾语共现时的句法构造
중국문학
2022 .02
-
한국인 영어 학습자의 중립적 상황에서의 수량 양화사를 포함한 영어 부정문의 선호 의미에 관한 연구
영어학
2018 .12
-
‘V/A+得+一+Nm+X’ 구문 중 ‘Nm’의 인지적 연구
중국어문학논집
2017 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-820-002169015