지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Residency-General of Korea has established and implemented a new policy in order to secure the education of Korea, which became the ‘protectorate’ of Japan. In 1908, the enactment and promulgation of the “Regulations on Textbook Inspection” was also intended to control the school education and the contents of education through the textbook inspection and censorship. The policy to control the textbooks used by schools was implemented in Western countries as well as in Japan and Ching China at the modern education. The state or government tried to intervene actively with textbooks that have a direct influence on education implementing textbook inspection or government published textbooks. In this study, after analyzing the inspection copy of “Pot'onghak susinsŏ(Ordinary Ethics)” which was censored with “Regulations on Textbooks Inspection”, the followings were found out. First, the textbook inspection was conducted actually according to the procedure of the regulation after the “regulations on textbook inspection” was promulgated. Second, the censors who were in charge of the inspection, censored the contents of the textbook in accordance with the standards of social and political as well as educational aspects. And most revision requests only as an expression appear to have applied educational standards considering. However, as a result of examining the original texts of the textbook that demanded correction or deletion, the contents of the society, the country, patriotism, loyalty, duties and rights of the people took a lot of points. In the process of inspecting the textbooks by department of education, practically residency-general, it applied social and political criterion such as “to assert independence and to restore national rights,” “to make uncomfortable expressions for nationalism and deontology,” “to inspire partiotism” to the textbook and did not authorize the publishing of “Pot'onghak susinsŏ(Ordinary Ethics)” judged to be problematic in these standards.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0