인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
This paper examines authentic uses of the away at/on conative constructions, which have received much less attention than the typical at conative construction. Adopting the collexeme analysis, this paper investigates what the collexeme verbs are in two constructions and how similar and different their real life uses are. The results first show that the distribution of entire collexeme verbs in the away at/on construction as a whole does not tell us much about their properties and they instead provide a justification for an analysis of the verb-class-specific constructions depending on verb meanings: verbs of ingesting, verbs of cutting, verbs of hitting, and verbs of touching. The results also show that the away at and away on conative constructions do not, in fact, exhibit uniform behavior across the four major different verb classes. They further indicate that the away on conative construction cannot be regarded as a sub-type of the away at conative construction, as opposed to previous literature, since they show different and even contrasting behavior with respect to preferred verb types and preference for literal or figurative usage. Our findings, therefore, suggest that it is worthwhile exploring properties related to collexemes based on verb-class-specific constructions with authentic corpus data and statistical tests and that in this way we can make important observations that simple introspection-based studies are likely to miss out.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
