지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.1
- 수록면
- 455 - 477 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study investigates the causes of Japan's failure to reconcile the matter of South Korean “comfort women” from World War II. It draws on reconciliation theory to determine the cause of failure by Japan. After a review of the literature on this issue with an emphasis on its history, the effect of Japan's problem‐solving attempts, and the backlash after the 2015 “comfort women” agreement, we call attention to Japan's weak civil society and its distortion of history in textbooks as internal causes of this failure. Moreover, we highlight the US–ROK–Japan trilateral security cooperation as an external cause of the deterioration of the reconciliation attempts. We conclude by noting that internal and external factors have made it more difficult for Japan to reconcile the matter of South Korean “comfort women.”
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
Ackermann, Alice / 1994 / Reconciliation as a Peace-Building Process in Postwar Europe—The Franco-German Case / Peace and Change 19(3):229~250
Beal, Tim / 2001 / Ghosts of the Past: The Japanese History Textbook Controversy / New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 3(2):177~188
천자현 / 2015 / Beyond “Dissatisfaction” and “Apology Fatigue”: Four Types of Japanese Official Apology / Pacific Focus 30(2):249~269
Chun, JaHyun / 2015 / Have Korea and Japan Reconciled? A Focus on the Three Stages of Reconciliation / Japanese Journal of Political Science 16(3):315~331
Chun, JaHyun / 2016 / The Role of Japan’s Civil Society Organizations and the Deteriorating Relationship between Japan and South Korea / International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 71(1):88~106
Beal, Tim / 2001 / Ghosts of the Past: The Japanese History Textbook Controversy / New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 3(2):177~188
천자현 / 2015 / Beyond “Dissatisfaction” and “Apology Fatigue”: Four Types of Japanese Official Apology / Pacific Focus 30(2):249~269
Chun, JaHyun / 2015 / Have Korea and Japan Reconciled? A Focus on the Three Stages of Reconciliation / Japanese Journal of Political Science 16(3):315~331
Chun, JaHyun / 2016 / The Role of Japan’s Civil Society Organizations and the Deteriorating Relationship between Japan and South Korea / International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 71(1):88~106
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Japan and Korea: Why Can’t they Reconcile?
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .06
-
‘언론’ 관련 용어의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 한국과 일본의 차이
한국언론정보학보
2021 .12
-
일본군‘위안부’문제에 대한 한국과 일본 사이의 인식과 대응의 차이
한국보훈논총
2018 .01
-
‘Comfort Women’ : A Lasting Barrier to Japan-South Korea Reconciliation
Global Asia
2015 .09
-
The so-called 2015 Agreement between Japan and South Korea and the Korean Comfort Women Issue
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2022 .11
-
战后日本国家大战略与日朝关系
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2016 .08
-
Can the Comfort Women Speak?: Mainstream US Media Representations of the Japanese Military Sex Slaves
Korea Journal
2021 .03
-
한일 안보협력을 둘러싼 국내적 수준과 국제적 수준의 상충성 분석과 함의
국제정치연구
2015 .12
-
US-Japan-Korea Co-operation : Where Next?
Global Asia
2017 .03
-
가해자와 피해자를 위한 조직세우기 - 한일 위안부 문제를 중심으로 -
한국예술치료학회지
2017 .11
-
Japan’s Semiconductor Strategy and Implications for Korea
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .09
-
김정은 정권의 대일 접근과 북일관계
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
Completing the U.S.-Japan-Korea Alliance Triangle: Prospects and Issues in Japan-Korea Security Cooperation
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
日本の新しい安全保障⋅防衛戦略: 拒否戦略を通じた競争戦略の体系
일본연구논총
2023 .06
-
60 Years of Normalization of ROK-Japan Diplomatic Relations: Achievements and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .01
-
한일 관계 개선과 공공외교 정책의 방향성에 관한 연구
국제학논총
2024 .06
-
[confronting history issues] A South Korean Perspective : Getting to a Deal on ‘Comfort Women’
Global Asia
2017 .03
-
미중 전략경쟁 시기의 한일관계: 양극화된 정치와 대일정책
일본연구논총
2022 .12
-
한·일·중의 일본군 위안부 문학의 현황과 과제
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
최근 일본의 대외정책과 한 · 일관계
계간 외교
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0