인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
The aim of this review was to compare calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers with various contemporary commercial sealers especially leakage / solubility aspect. An extensive search of the endodontic literature through pubmed was made to identify publications related to calcium hydroxide-based sealers, epoxy resin-based sealers, methacrylate resin-based sealers and bioceramic-based sealers. 1. All sealers leak in long-term evaluation (>60 days). (except MTA sealers, because they do not have long-term [>120 days] evaluation data yet.) 2. Some sealers have better short-term sealing ability (<30 days). (but, the result could be reversed in long-term evaluation and meaningless after some period, because all sealers leak eventually.) 3. Regardless of the type of sealers, leakage increases over time. 4. A lot of endodontic treatment failure cases are because of re-infection through various route. 5. It is very important for the long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth that installation of full coverage-type final restoration as soon as possible after endodontical treatment. (further research is required to estabilish the sealing ability of luting cement or core material) It seems right to use sealers that have best bacterial sealing ability during those period (about 20 days) until the installation of full coverage-type final restoration right after the endodontical treatment finished. In that case, calcium hydroxide-based sealers are very effective and efficient.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
