지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In automobile insurance policy which is the content of automobile insurance contract, the word "the insured" is generally defined in provisions of compensation liabilities and exception provisions. And then the scope of the insured is defined separately in extra provisions of each warranty. To make good use of automobile which is the benefit of civilization, the extend of compensation liability of automobile insurance is extended to the rate of practical use not only of the registered insured in the insurance policy but also someone of those are stipulated position or socially related people. The problem occurs whether the insured is an individual application or not. If there are the multiple insured who are liable to reparation in a car accident, the provisions of compensation liabilities and exclusions should be applied differently to each the insured because the insurable interest is individual and independent. There is no problem if the individual applications of the insured are expressly stipulated in insurance policy, but if there are not or partially stipulated in several provisions, it raises many contentions in compensation affairs. Each of the insured has his own insurable interest that all escape clauses shouldn't be interpreted as unconditional exception provisions. This research paper is focused on preventing the frequent confusions that resulted from the arbitrary constructions of the exception provisions in compensation affairs and on protecting the victims of the unilateral interpretations of the exception provisions by the insurers. Additionally, it should be considered to stipulate inclusively the individual applications of the insured as general provisions of the insurance policy to prevent interpretative confusion and to improve the problems.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0