지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The objective of this paper is to compare the ‘adjectival verb’(＝형용동사) in Japanese and the ‘adjectival root’(＝어근 / 관형명사) in Korean and to make a conclusion that they have to be classified in the same category on the basis of the common syntactico-semantic features. This study is motivated from observing that it is generally accepted that Korean has one type of adjective class unlike Japanese which has two types of adjective class, inflected adjectives (＝verb-like adjectives) and uninflected adjectives (＝noun-like adjectives) (Backhouse (2004)). Keeping in mind the fact that it is necessary to describe a given language in terms of consistent reference points in order to make language typology more perfect, I try to describe the adjective-related phenomena in Japanese and Korean. Also I suggest a new possibility of reorganizing the adjectives in Korean so that we can find new noun-like adjectives besides verb-like adjectives. Consequently, the lexemes traditionally called ‘adnouns / bound roots, etc.’ in Korean can be recognized or reorganized as simple ‘(nominal) adjectives’, and I can consider the so-called ‘adjectival verbs’ in Japanese as ‘nominal adjectives’. (University of Seoul)
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0