지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives：The Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) was developed as a brief, clinically useful, reliable, and valid self-report questionnaire for the evaluation of depression outcome. This study aimed to standardize Korean version of the CUDOS (CUDOS-K). Method：The CUDOS was translated into Korean in due process. The subjects were 70 patients, who were undergoing either inpatient or outpatient treatment for major depressive disorder diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, and 50 normal controls. The subjects, both depressed and normal control, were also administered CUDOS-K, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17), Korean Version of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), The Patient Health Questionnaire Nine-item Screener (PHQ-9), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). Results：The CUDOS-K had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.911) and high split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown formula=.949). The correlation coefficients between the CUDOS-K and CGI-S, HDRS-17, CES-D, and PHQ-9 were respectively high. To identify factor structure of the CUDOS-K, factor analysis was performed. There were five factors above eigen value 1.0, which explained 71.635% of variances. Conclusion：These results suggests that the CUDOS-K is reliable and valid self-report questionnaire for the outcome measurement of depressive symptoms, and it could be a valuable additions to routine clinical practice for the evaluation of depressive symptoms.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0