메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김건호 (충북대학교)
저널정보
안암법학회 안암법학 안암법학 제25호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
621 - 646 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A Study on the Issues of Extinctive Prescription System An attitude of precedent on the issues of extinctive prescription is as following. A claim of registration as an obligatory claim that produce legal act is applied in principle extinctive prescription of 10 years. However if real estate purchaser is delivered object and continuously possess or succeed the possession disposing of to another person. extinctive prescription is not gone. Founded in real estate possession If occupant's registration claim which acquisitive prescription is completed does not use 10 years from a day the occupant loses possession, extinctive prescription is completed. And real claim of property is not applied extinctive prescription. However effect on suspension of prescription does not occurs justly that there was defendant’acceptance of legal suit. As pleading principle, defendant insists that acceptance of the suit or other suit discontinue prescription therefore effect on suspension of prescription appears. A completion of extinctive prescription lapse the right. If person who received profit of the prescription by completion of extinctive prescription does not assert litigation that receive effect of the right extinction, court should not take foundation of judgement. A formative right is always applied limitation and if its right is not particular term of existence that limitation of 10 years is applied from time that the right occurs.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0