지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.1
- 수록면
- 129 - 157 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to develop evaluation tool for ROKAF medical unit. and is composed of the following contents. The study is a methodological research to develop evaluation tool for ROKAF ASMC(Aerospace Medical Center) and 14 medical units at the level of Fighter Wing. About 300 servicemen including nursing officers and flight surgeons in ASMC and 14 medical units at the level of Fighter Wing are selected for survey. We distributed, through military e-mail, the questionnaire with explanations on the purpose of the survey to 300 medical servicemen including nursing officers in 14 medical units at the level of Fighter Wing and analysed 273 responses which was delivered before deadline. SPSS 10.0 PC+ was used for the statistical analysis. For the verification of the developed evaluation tool for ROKAF medical unit. and is composed of the following contents, the reliability obtained by calculating Cronbach's α was 0.9286. Among 100 evaluation items which relatively new activities like as‘pilot obesity management(1.85±.87)’,‘quarterly maintenance flight activity/report (1.91±.86)’,‘statistics & report of civilian medical service(1.65±.80)’, ‘achievement report of anti-smoking campaign(1.67±.81)’,‘keeping and report of treatment records(2.07±.71)’,‘QI activity(1.57±.85)’ and‘medical advisor system(1.59±.87)’ appeared to be lowly necessary for evaluation, while conventional activities such as‘observance of decision procedure on transient grounding/waiver/permanent grounding(2.67±.52)’,‘observation of disqualification decision criteria in physical examination(2.59±.60)’,‘establishment & execution of food poisoning counterplan(2.31±.65)’,‘education of emergency treatment(2.29±.68)’,‘ambulance maintenance(2.65±.74)’,‘treatment document management(2.41±.66)’,‘personnel management(2.33±.68)’ and‘equipment management(2.27±.65)’ appeared to be highly necessary. Administrative support domain is the highest score among whole groups. Items related to departments of training and research in ASMC appeared to be lowly necessary for evaluation.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0