인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Public officials have a ‘dual status’: that of a public official and that of a general citizen. Public officials are subjects of basic rights who enjoy basic rights, and restrictions on basic rights can be made wider and stronger than those of the general public. Restricted political activities for public officials are, in principle, requested to be related to political parties or elections, and it is desirable to allow other political activities as much as possible.
Since public officials are both public officials and private persons, they should be able to enjoy their basic rights as a general private member to the maximum extent possible outside of working hours or while performing their duties.
In particular, when a public official does not use public facilities or exercise his authority outside of working hours, this should be regarded as an act as a private person, not as a public official. Nevertheless, if these actions are restricted on the grounds of the establishment of a public official"s working discipline or political neutrality, it violates the principle of least infringement.
In order to secure the political neutrality of education, it is necessary to fundamentally examine whether it is necessary to restrict the election campaign of education officials comprehensively and completely.
The provision of the prohibition of election campaigns for educational public officials under the current “Public Official Election Act” completely prohibits all election campaigns for educational public officials. Since the political neutrality of education officials can be said to be a means to secure the political neutrality of education, it is necessary to prepare a monitoring and control device to prevent the education conducted by teachers, who are actually educational officials, from undermining political neutrality. I"d say it can be secured enough.
Since public officials are both public officials and private persons, they should be able to enjoy their basic rights as a general private member to the maximum extent possible outside of working hours or while performing their duties.
In particular, when a public official does not use public facilities or exercise his authority outside of working hours, this should be regarded as an act as a private person, not as a public official. Nevertheless, if these actions are restricted on the grounds of the establishment of a public official"s working discipline or political neutrality, it violates the principle of least infringement.
In order to secure the political neutrality of education, it is necessary to fundamentally examine whether it is necessary to restrict the election campaign of education officials comprehensively and completely.
The provision of the prohibition of election campaigns for educational public officials under the current “Public Official Election Act” completely prohibits all election campaigns for educational public officials. Since the political neutrality of education officials can be said to be a means to secure the political neutrality of education, it is necessary to prepare a monitoring and control device to prevent the education conducted by teachers, who are actually educational officials, from undermining political neutrality. I"d say it can be secured enough.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-360-001169141
