메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최성호 (충북대학교)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제93호
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
85 - 120 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper discusses the parts-of-speech system in Korean, proposing several points relevant for the system, claiming that there are two major parts-of-speech in Korean (noun and verb), and thus disregarding the category of adjectives as a major part-of-speech. It is claimed that the principal criterion for establishing the part-of-speech system is distributional facts of lexemes in syntax regarding the possibility of their performing grammatical functions in grammatical constructions, viz ‘functional distribution.’ Upon this criterion, the two parts-of-speech show complementary distribution in terms of grammatical functions. Emphasizing the fact that nouns can occur as adjuncts/modifiers in the grammatical construction of ‘individual-referencing’, this paper claims that those lexemes that have been classified in some recent studies as “adjectives” should be treated as nouns. Further what has been referred to traditionally as “adjectives” having the lexical meaning of property, state, quality, etc. should be classified as a semantics-driven sub-class of the part-of-speech of verb, since they share identical syntactic properties with what has been referred to as “verbs” having the lexical meaning of action or locomotion, etc. Thus the verb in the sense suggested in this paper is sub-classified into action verbs, state verbs, and mentality verbs. It is made clear that differences in distribution among these three sub-verbs are not part-of-speech differences but differences due to their lexico-semantic properties. Finally, this paper proposes the notion of ‘syntactic category converter,’ which is defined as a morpheme converting a word/phrase of certain syntactic category to a word/phrase of different syntactic category.

목차

1. 들어가기: 왜 품사론인가
2. 예비적 논의
3. 한국어 품사 설정
4. 통사범주 전환
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-710-001683662