지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.3
- 수록면
- 1 - 338 (338page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As society changes and becomes complex at a rapid pace, the factors that determine the value of life are also diversifying. In a society that valued objective and material conditions such as economic growth, the importance of subjective aspects such as quality of life and sustainability is increasing. Under such background, interest in the level of life is increasing, and various areas and dimensions are being considered to measure the quality of life. In particular, since Gyeonggi Province is a local government with the largest number of residents and the characteristics of each city and county are different, it is necessary to continuously measure and analyze the quality of life of residents at the local government level.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was conducted for the following purposes. First, it aims to measure the lives of Gyeonggi-do citizens at the level of quantitative and qualitative dimensions. Second, it was intended to produce large-scale data that could identify the quality of life of Gyeonggi-do residents. Finally, it aims to produce basic data to be used for policy elicitation through the calculation of 31 regional statistical data.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was intended to include large-scale samples to identify the level of life by reflecting various characteristics of Gyeonggi Province residents. Accordingly, the target population was set up for all general households living in 31 cities and counties in Gyeonggi-do and for households aged 15 or older. After the verification and cleaning process, we obtained the final 16,000 households and 33,677 persons.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province consisted of a total of 14 areas and 116 questions. Based on the National Statistical Office"s quality of life indicator system, it maintained three frameworks: individual, social relations, and environmental conditions, and tried to examine the quality of life by dividing the non-material and material parts.
The overall satisfaction with life was 6.3 points, which was confirmed to be a little more satisfied than medium. Regarding the quality of life compared to before Corona 19, 61.3% of Gyeonggi residents responded that it decreased. By sector, satisfaction with family was highest, followed by health, environment/safety, and housing. On the other hand, leisure, employment, and education were identified as areas of low satisfaction.
As for the factors affecting the quality of life, the family accounted for the highest at 31.6%, followed by health and health at 17.4%, housing at 17.0%, and households at 11.2%. Lastly, among the areas that local governments need to improve to increase the quality of life for residents, the proportion of respondents with “employment and jobs” was the highest. And social security and welfare, income security, and health and medical care were shown in the order of the next.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was converted to a cross-sectional survey to obtain a sample that can be analyzed by each region and to collect data that can explore both household and individual characteristics. And it is significant in that it is possible to grasp the citizens" thoughts, opinions, and actual conditions in more diverse areas by supplementing the factors that have an important influence on the quality of life. On the other hand, preparations for statistics approved by the National Statistical Office or the establishment of investigation design and response measures suitable for the Corona 19 situation are areas that need to be supplemented for future investigations.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was conducted for the following purposes. First, it aims to measure the lives of Gyeonggi-do citizens at the level of quantitative and qualitative dimensions. Second, it was intended to produce large-scale data that could identify the quality of life of Gyeonggi-do residents. Finally, it aims to produce basic data to be used for policy elicitation through the calculation of 31 regional statistical data.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was intended to include large-scale samples to identify the level of life by reflecting various characteristics of Gyeonggi Province residents. Accordingly, the target population was set up for all general households living in 31 cities and counties in Gyeonggi-do and for households aged 15 or older. After the verification and cleaning process, we obtained the final 16,000 households and 33,677 persons.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province consisted of a total of 14 areas and 116 questions. Based on the National Statistical Office"s quality of life indicator system, it maintained three frameworks: individual, social relations, and environmental conditions, and tried to examine the quality of life by dividing the non-material and material parts.
The overall satisfaction with life was 6.3 points, which was confirmed to be a little more satisfied than medium. Regarding the quality of life compared to before Corona 19, 61.3% of Gyeonggi residents responded that it decreased. By sector, satisfaction with family was highest, followed by health, environment/safety, and housing. On the other hand, leisure, employment, and education were identified as areas of low satisfaction.
As for the factors affecting the quality of life, the family accounted for the highest at 31.6%, followed by health and health at 17.4%, housing at 17.0%, and households at 11.2%. Lastly, among the areas that local governments need to improve to increase the quality of life for residents, the proportion of respondents with “employment and jobs” was the highest. And social security and welfare, income security, and health and medical care were shown in the order of the next.
The 2020 Quality of Life Survey for the residents of Gyeonggi province was converted to a cross-sectional survey to obtain a sample that can be analyzed by each region and to collect data that can explore both household and individual characteristics. And it is significant in that it is possible to grasp the citizens" thoughts, opinions, and actual conditions in more diverse areas by supplementing the factors that have an important influence on the quality of life. On the other hand, preparations for statistics approved by the National Statistical Office or the establishment of investigation design and response measures suitable for the Corona 19 situation are areas that need to be supplemented for future investigations.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[연구요약]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 국내외 삶의 질 지표 검토
[제2장 조사 개요]
제1절 조사 설계
제2절 설문 구성 및 내용
[제3장 조사 진행]
제1절 조사 수행 및 검증
제2절 데이터 처리 및 가중치
제3절 응답자 일반 특성
[제4장 기초분석 결과]
제1절 공통 문항
제2절 주거
제3절 가계
제4절 가족
제5절 고용
제6절 교통
제7절 환경 및 안전
제8절 건강과 보건
제9절 여가
제10절 교육
제11절 사회통합
제12절 기본소득
[제5장 결론]
제1절 결과 요약 및 시사점
제2절 의의 및 한계
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
2020 경기도민 삶의 질 조사 (통계편)
정책연구
2021 .03
-
경기도민 삶의 질 동태 분석을 위한 기초 연구
정책연구
2016 .12
-
지속가능발전 관점에서 경기도민의 주관적 삶의 질 영향 요인 분석
환경교육
2018 .06
-
경기도민 삶의 만족 영향 요인 분석
지방행정연구
2022 .12
-
삶의 질 측정을 위한 종단 조사 설계 연구 : 경기도민 삶의 질 조사의 사례를 중심으로
GRI 연구논총
2017 .12
-
경기도민 삶의 질 동태분석을 위한 가구패널 기초연구
정책연구
2018 .06
-
지역주민의 일상생활과 행복에 대한 탐색적 연구 -제1차 경기도민 삶의 질 조사를 중심으로-
한국지적정보학회지
2019 .08
-
‘삶의 질’과 소득의 관계에서 사회자본의 매개효과 : ‘경기도민의 삶의 질’ 조사를 활용하여
GRI 연구논총
2018 .11
-
경기도 내 소득계층과 주민참여가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
한국지방자치학회보
2018 .06
-
지역 환경에 대한 거주민의 인식이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향: 경기 북부-남부의 지역 간 차이를 중심으로
지방행정연구
2022 .06
-
지역 재난관리 수준에 대한 인식이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 : 지역, 학력의 조절효과를 중심으로
GRI 연구논총
2017 .12
-
지역사회 복지정책의 중요도와 만족도에 관한 실증분석 : 경기도를 중심으로
한국정책연구
2023 .09
-
삶의 질 영향요인 추세분석 : 상향확산이론의 적용을 중심으로
사회과학연구논총
2018 .10
-
관광지에서의 지역주민 현장 경험과 삶의 질에 대한 이해: ‘정숙관광 캠페인’ 경험에 대한 해석학적 현상학의 접근
관광학연구
2022 .06
-
경기도 삶의 질 Brief 2016
정책연구
2017 .09
-
애착도 관여도가 관광요인과 삶의 질 향상에 미치는 영향
관광진흥연구
2019 .01
-
행복의 의미와 조건에 관한 논의와 오스트레일리아의 지리교과서의 행복 내용 분석
한국지리환경교육학회지
2018 .01
-
세대 · 계층별에 따른 삶의 질 영향요인 분석과 도시경쟁력 발전을 위한 연구: 부산시를 중심으로
정책분석평가학회보
2022 .12
-
장애인의 객관적·주관적 삶의 질에 따른 잠재계층분석과 영향요인 분석
장애와 고용
2018 .02
-
대전지역 삶의 질에 대한 주관적 인식 유형 연구 : Q 방법론 활용
한국인구학
2020 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-309-000110209