인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The Equal Employment Opportunity and Work-Family Balance Assistance Act(hereinafter referred to as the ‘Employment Equality Act’) was legislated as the name of ‘Sexual Equality Employment Act’ in 1987 and came into force in 1988, and the law was enacted for the purpose of contributing to the improvement of the status of working women and promotion of their welfare by securing equal opportunity and treatment between men and women in any employment in conformity with the ideal of equality in the Constitution, protecting the maternity and developing their vocational ability.
‘The principle of equal pay for the work of equal value’(Equal Employment Act §8 ① “The employer shall provide equal pay for equal-value work within the identical business.”), which was not included in the original Act, was specified at the time of the amendment in 1989. Since then, the main skeleton of the law clause has remained until now without any changes, and then the provision has been in place for 33 years.
This paper critically examines the criteria for judging the principle of equal pay for equal-value work, which has thus been established and accumulated through the implementation of the law for 30 years or so, and explores one direction of interpretation.
Prior to this, this paper reviews the background of the creation of the principle of equal pay for equal-value work, international standards and legislative practices of individual countries (USA, Canada, UK, Germany), the legislative formulation of the principle of equal pay for equal-value work under national law, and the relationship between the principle of equality and Article 8 of the Equal Employment Act.
‘The principle of equal pay for the work of equal value’(Equal Employment Act §8 ① “The employer shall provide equal pay for equal-value work within the identical business.”), which was not included in the original Act, was specified at the time of the amendment in 1989. Since then, the main skeleton of the law clause has remained until now without any changes, and then the provision has been in place for 33 years.
This paper critically examines the criteria for judging the principle of equal pay for equal-value work, which has thus been established and accumulated through the implementation of the law for 30 years or so, and explores one direction of interpretation.
Prior to this, this paper reviews the background of the creation of the principle of equal pay for equal-value work, international standards and legislative practices of individual countries (USA, Canada, UK, Germany), the legislative formulation of the principle of equal pay for equal-value work under national law, and the relationship between the principle of equality and Article 8 of the Equal Employment Act.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
