인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Objective: The evaluation of driving performance is conducted on the CMS and the rear view of the side during the driving of the actual vehicle, and an improvement plan is proposed for CMS.
Background: Rearview mirrors play an essential role in the vehicle (especially in cars) while taking reverse, parking, and changing lanes. Current cars are equipped with many safeguards (cruiser functions, autonomous driving, lane departure prevention, etc.) to help drivers. The camera monitoring system (CMS) has been used as one of the rearview mirrors in recent times. However, the visual acuity while using CMS is not considered enough in ergonomics research.
Method: Thirty subjects without any eye diseases took part in this study. An experiment was performed with two vehicles installed with a rearview mirror and another with CMS. To compare the two conditions fixation time and saccade time were evaluated.
Results: Overall, using CMS required lower fixation time and saccade time than the conventional rearview mirror. All these results showed that CMS requires less cognitive load than rearview mirrors.
Conclusion: There were problems with glare and distance, and there was no sign of caution in the available rearview mirror in CMS.
Application: If the problems and cautions about future glare and distance are solved and applied, it will be the design of a safer CMS.
Background: Rearview mirrors play an essential role in the vehicle (especially in cars) while taking reverse, parking, and changing lanes. Current cars are equipped with many safeguards (cruiser functions, autonomous driving, lane departure prevention, etc.) to help drivers. The camera monitoring system (CMS) has been used as one of the rearview mirrors in recent times. However, the visual acuity while using CMS is not considered enough in ergonomics research.
Method: Thirty subjects without any eye diseases took part in this study. An experiment was performed with two vehicles installed with a rearview mirror and another with CMS. To compare the two conditions fixation time and saccade time were evaluated.
Results: Overall, using CMS required lower fixation time and saccade time than the conventional rearview mirror. All these results showed that CMS requires less cognitive load than rearview mirrors.
Conclusion: There were problems with glare and distance, and there was no sign of caution in the available rearview mirror in CMS.
Application: If the problems and cautions about future glare and distance are solved and applied, it will be the design of a safer CMS.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
