메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(한국패시브건축협회) (한국패시브건축협회) (한국패시브건축협회) (숭실대학교) (한국패시브건축협회)
저널정보
한국생활환경학회 한국생활환경학회지 한국생활환경학회지 제29권 제5호
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    As demand for low-energy buildings increases, indoor environment, and ventilation evaluation is becoming critical. However, it is difficult to find studies that evaluated complex factors other than mechanical ventilation, such as void, natural ventilation, IoT, and the number of occupants. Therefore, in this study, a total of seven scenarios were established based on four ventilation factors, and general buildings before remodelings and low-energy building after remodeling were analyzed based on three evaluation indicators (energy usage, discomfort time, and ACH). In conclusion, energy consumption was most affected by ventilation methods, and building performance also had ample influence that low-energy buildings had an average utilization rate of 30% compared to general buildings. Discomfort time was most affected by the ventilation method, which had RreliefF contribution was 42%, and natural ventilation was likely to be exposed to high discomfort time regardless of other ventilation factors. Finally, in the case of ACH, low-energy buildings did not meet the average minimum standard in all scenarios when only indoor temperature and humidity were considered as ventilation standards. Rather, ventilation in general buildings meets the criteria for ACH values, so it is necessary to consider whether ventilation can be performed simultaneously with temperature, humidity, and comfort.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기