인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.8
- 수록면
- 21 - 40 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2022.5.33.3.21
이용수
초록· 키워드
The legal relationship between the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the unification provisions of Article 4 of the Constitution can be interpreted harmoniously with the provisions of Article 4 depending on how the meaning of the provisions of Article 3 is understood. If Article 3 is interpreted from the viewpoint of viewing North Korea as an illegal organization, as the Supreme Court"s opinion, the conflict with Article 4 is normatively unavoidable, and the only way to resolve this is to revise the Constitution. In the end, it is said that the way to utilize the normative power of the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the meaning of the peaceful unification provisions of Article 4 to pursue a constitutional unification policy depends on how to understand the meaning of the territorial provisions of Article 3. While acknowledging the stark reality of the existence of North Korea occupying a certain area of the Korean Peninsula, in order to preserve the normative power of the clause “The territory of the Republic of Korea consists of the Korean Peninsula and its annexed islands”, the meaning of territory in this clause should be interpreted in international law.In foreign relations, it should be interpreted that the scope of the territory of the Republic of Korea has been declared, and that although North Korea occupies a certain area of the Korean Peninsula in the future, the scope of the territory of a unified Korea in the future is the same as in Article 3.
It is necessary to look at the scope of the normative power of territorial provisions in external international legal relations and internal inter-Korean relations. Externally, the normative power of the territorial provisions of Article 3 extends to the Korean Peninsula, but internally, it must be seen that it does not reach the North Korean region.
Normative power up to the North Korean region should be considered to be realized after a unified Korea. As long as it is interpreted in this way, there will be no conflict between the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the provisions of Article 4 of peaceful reunification. The most practical way to solve the problem without resorting to such an interpretation is to re-establish Article 3 of the territorial provisions through constitutional revision and to prepare a reunification plan similar to that of West Germany in the constitution.
It is necessary to look at the scope of the normative power of territorial provisions in external international legal relations and internal inter-Korean relations. Externally, the normative power of the territorial provisions of Article 3 extends to the Korean Peninsula, but internally, it must be seen that it does not reach the North Korean region.
Normative power up to the North Korean region should be considered to be realized after a unified Korea. As long as it is interpreted in this way, there will be no conflict between the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the provisions of Article 4 of peaceful reunification. The most practical way to solve the problem without resorting to such an interpretation is to re-establish Article 3 of the territorial provisions through constitutional revision and to prepare a reunification plan similar to that of West Germany in the constitution.
#헌법 제3조 영토조항
#헌법 제4조 통일조항
#헌법개정
#통일방안
#흡수통일
#Constitution Article 3
#Constitution Article 4
#Territorial Provisions
#Unification Provisions
#Constitution Revision
#Unification Plan
#Absorption Unification
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 남북한 관계에서 영토조항의 법적 의미
- Ⅲ. 남북한 관계에서 통일조항의 법적 의미
- Ⅳ. 영토조항과 통일조항의 관계
- Ⅴ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
