개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 47 - 55 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic surgery are minimally invasive options for early treatment of colorectal cancer, however, more evidence of the long-term outcomes between the two procedures is needed to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes between endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment for early colorectal cancer.
Methods: The study group included 60 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment and 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for early colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 2010 and December 2013 at a single study site.
Results: Histopathological diagnoses showed that 43 (78.3%) carcinomas in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group were mucosal to sm1, 13 (21.7%) were sm2 or deeper, and 17 high-risk cases (28.3%) in the endoscopic group underwent additional surgery. The median operation time, time to sips of water, and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the endoscopic group than in the laparoscopic group. The overall survival rates of patients in the endoscopic group and laparoscopic groups were 91.5% and 87.4%, respectively (P=0.391), and the disease-free survival rates were 90.4% and 87.4% (P=0.614), respectively. Systemic recurrences occurred in two patients (1.6%) in the endoscopic group and one patient (2.0%) in the laparoscopic group. Local recurrence combined with systemic recurrence in one patient (0.8%) in the endoscopic group.
Conclusion: Endoscopic resection for early colorectal cancer can be performed safely with better short-term outcomes and comparable long-term oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: The study group included 60 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment and 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for early colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 2010 and December 2013 at a single study site.
Results: Histopathological diagnoses showed that 43 (78.3%) carcinomas in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group were mucosal to sm1, 13 (21.7%) were sm2 or deeper, and 17 high-risk cases (28.3%) in the endoscopic group underwent additional surgery. The median operation time, time to sips of water, and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the endoscopic group than in the laparoscopic group. The overall survival rates of patients in the endoscopic group and laparoscopic groups were 91.5% and 87.4%, respectively (P=0.391), and the disease-free survival rates were 90.4% and 87.4% (P=0.614), respectively. Systemic recurrences occurred in two patients (1.6%) in the endoscopic group and one patient (2.0%) in the laparoscopic group. Local recurrence combined with systemic recurrence in one patient (0.8%) in the endoscopic group.
Conclusion: Endoscopic resection for early colorectal cancer can be performed safely with better short-term outcomes and comparable long-term oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Challenges in Implementing Endoscopic Resection for T2 Colorectal Cancer
Gut and Liver
2024 .03
-
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer
Intestinal research
2022 .07
-
Endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age : the morbidity outcomes
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .06
-
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Following Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery : Colorectal Field
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for ColoRectal Cancer : Experience of First 10 years
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
[Colorectal] Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes after Open Conversion in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Quality of Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
ESD vs Laparoscopic Surgery for Early Colorectal Cancer
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer in Elderly
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Colorectal Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Focus on Endoscopic Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Colorectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
Colorectal Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Colorectal Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Colorectal Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Colorectal Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
[Colorectal] Analysis of Risk Factors for Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in Stage I Colorectal Cancer after Radical Resection; A Single Center 15 Years’ Experiences
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0