메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤요선 (한국건설기술연구원) 장대희 (한국건설기술연구원)
저널정보
한국태양에너지학회 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 제42권 제6호
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
115 - 125 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
G-SEED is a system that comprehensively evaluates the eco-friendliness of buildings. As a carbon reduction strategy in buildings, the role of G-SEED system is becoming increasingly important. In this study, the main revisions of G-SEED since 2016 are reviewed, and data related to certification results of multi-residential buildings are analyzed in detail. In addition, considerations for future revisions are reviewed. G-SEED has been reorganized six times since the 2016 revision, and only the 2016-2 version and 2016-6 version have been upgraded in difficulty. In particular, certification items for materials and resources have been strengthened. In the analysis of the certification results of multi-residential buildings, the score analysis by specialized field and the acquisition rate by certification items were analyzed. Energy and environmental pollution scored highest in the score analysis, while the ecological environment scored the lowest. Acquisition rate analysis revealed that 17 items were acquired at a level of 90%, and the lower five items were acquired at less than 30%. In addition, 17 items with a biased specific grade were identified through acquisition rate analysis. Based on these observations, the following issues need to be addressed in future revisions: 1) set the final grade and review the target score according to the level of difficulty for each specialization 2) review the existing required items or the mandatory items. 3) review whether to maintain certification items low acquisition rate. 4) review the level of difficulty adjustment within the underweight or overweight items with a specific grade.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 녹색건축 인증제도
3. 공동주택 인증취득 점수 분석
4. 공동주택 인증취득률 분석
5. 분석 및 토의
6. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-563-000242473