인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第256輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 139 - 176 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/tkhr.2022.12.256.139
이용수
초록· 키워드
Over the past decades, scholars have excavated the Mongol Empire’s far-reaching legacy in shaping the world’s subsequent history. A new historiographical development has argued that the early Ming rulers aimed to succeed the Mongol world empire by incorporating neighboring polities through rituals. Korean elites allegedly corresponded to the Ming advances by internalizing the Sinocentric worldview and Korea’s predetermined position as a vassal of the world empire in China. This article critically examines this position by first raising the following two points. First, arguments for the Ming"s integration of Korea through rituals may have overstated their case, as some relevant rituals appear to do the opposite. Second, this group of scholars seems to ignore that the Sinocentric worldview did not allow “private interaction” for its vassals and that Korea’s “autonomy” in its foreign policy could not be justified. This article elaborated on this point by exemplifying Chosŏn Korea’s foreign policies during the reign of king Injo. This article then critically examines the definition of Sinocentrism itself, which numerous scholars have misleadingly interpreted as a universal cultural or intellectual paradigm. As a related point, this article argues that Sinocentrism’s universal aspect is rooted in China’s need as a historical empire to assimilate its ethnic minorities. Contrary to the argument that Korea fully accepted the Sinocentric worldview as a vassal of the Chinese empire, this article concludes that Korea’s endorsement of Sinocentrism had little to do with China itself and involved significant alteration per the political and intellectual context of Chosŏn Korea.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- I. 머리말: 몽골 제국의 유산으로서의 조명관계론
- II. 조명관계에서의 의례와 사교(私交) 문제
- III. 제국(帝國)의 사상으로서의 중화주의
- IV. 결어: 조선에서의 중화주의
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
