메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(창원대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2023년 봄호(통권 제142호)
오류 신고하기

피인용 5

검색

    초록·키워드

    The last 〈message〉 or 〈letter〉 said to have been sent to Ahn Jung-geun by his mother, Maria Jo, appeared in many scholarly articles and proliferated to broadcasts, entertainment programs, musicals, and movies. Today, such dissemination seemingly has been incorporated as a ‘historical fact.’ This study revealed the logical contradiction of the contents of 〈Letter〉 or 〈Message〉 and the manipulation process by comparing them to related historical materials. The two kinds of fabrication of 〈Letter〉 or 〈Message〉 were made in 1994. One was in January by Japanese Saito(齋藤泰彦), and the other was in April by Korean Choi Seomyeon. The seeds of this fabrication branched out into academic writings and expanded to all directions in the 21st century.
    The fabrication of 〈Letter〉 and 〈Message〉 distorted the reason Jo Maria opposed her son Ahn Jung-geun’s appeal. That is, while homicide is a crime of violating the Ten Commandments, the manipulation transformed this into an act of pride. Because of this distortion, the unity of Jo Maria and Ahn Jung-geun’s position with the peaceful method of the anti-Japanese independence movement was lost. is issue of the peaceful method is a critical matter in succeeding Ahn Jung-geun’s Oriental Peace Theory.
    In order to uncover the fabricated 〈letter〉 or 〈message〉 incorporated into ‘history,’ it is necessary to secure the rigor of maintaining objectivity to a well-disposed subject of interest and the academic openness that entitles critical thinking about the more patriotic themes.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-905-000452548