메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
문미성 (경기연구원) 김은경 (경기연구원) 정선화 (서울대) 박소영 (경기연구원)
저널정보
경기연구원 정책연구 [정책연구 2022-46] 도시제조업 생태계와 경기도 정책방향 연구
발행연도
2022.10
수록면
1 - 153 (153page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to find the policy direction of Gyeonggi-do by analyzing the industrial ecosystem of the urban manufacturing industry in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. Global large cities such as London and New York are implementing manufacturing promotion policy for employment (jobs), circular economy (sustainability), and innovative growth. In the major cities of Gyeonggi-do, an economic recession is occurring along with an absolute decrease in the manufacturing sector. It is necessary to review the feasibility of introducing an urban manufacturing promotion policy as a means of revitalizing the old industrial area in Gyeonggi-do. The main results of this study are as follows. First, despite the stagnation of urban manufacturing, the need for urban production continues, and furthermore, there is the development of high-value-added businesses. Second, with the advancement of urban manufacturing industry, the diversity of industrial structures in cities is expanding. Third, small-volume customized production, a characteristic of the existing urban manufacturing industry, continues, but as the regional division of labor weakens, the dependence on urban manufacturing clusters has decreased. The policy implications are as follows. First, there is a need for policy intervention for maintenance and continuation of urban manufacturing ecosystem. Urban manufacturing is an important component of the innovation ecosystem. Second, as a means of revitalizing the old industrial areas in Gyeonggi-do, support programs are needed for the development of urban manufacturing. Unlike in the past, the dependence of urban manufacturing on existing agglomerates has weakened, the possibility of urban manufacturing development has increased even in small and medium-sized cities(Bucheon, Seongnam, etc.) other than downtown Seoul. Third, as the concentration of specific industries in the urban manufacturing industry is weakening, it is necessary to support the creation of businesses that target customized demand within the city, such as lighting and furniture industries as well as clothing manufacturing and metalworking.

목차

[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구배경 및 목적
2. 연구내용 및 방법
3. 선행연구 고찰
[제2장 도시제조업 사례연구]
1. EU의 도시제조업 정책
2. 영국 런던 광역시(Greater London) 사례
3. 미국 뉴욕(City of New York) 사례
4. 국내 서울 사례
5. 시사점
[제3장 도시제조업 산업생태계]
1. 수도권 도시제조업 현황
2. 도시제조업 산업생태계 비교 연구
3. 소결
[제4장 결론]
1. 연구요약
2. 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-309-000445876