메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조선정 (서울대학교)
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제30권 제2호
발행연도
2022.9
수록면
111 - 140 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay presents a brief historiography of contemporary feminist literary criticism from the perspective of subjectless critique. Believed to be centered around the core concept of female subjectivity, feminist literary criticism is supposed to address issues related with what it means to be a woman, to write as a woman, to be constantly aligned with collective traits of femininity. Nonetheless, the very category of woman has always been contested as it needs to be deconstructed in its essentialist assumptions and to be reconfigured in pursuit of multiplicity, singularity, irreducibility, and, most importantly, difference not just among women but rather within a subject. Such perpetual instability or impossibility of the category of woman, paradoxically enough, enables feminist discourses to remain open to re-negotiation with intersecting axes of subjectivity formation. This essay attempts to examine how the discourse of feminist literary criticism can be decentered through radical intervention with the linear temporality and ceaseless re-significations of feminine difference as well. The structure of the essay consists of the following components. First, feminist literary criticism is contextualized under the rubric of ’critique’ elaborated by Michel Foucault. Then, I revisit Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own to tap into its audacious dismissal of binary gender definition and its nuanced proposal of subjectless writer. Next, drawing on Julia Kristeva’s formulation of literary inscription of feminist temporality, I discuss the ways in which sexual difference can be theorized in relation with subjectless state. The final thesis ’feminism which is not one’ is demonstrated with emphases on disidentifying process of becoming, which requires a critical distance from amenable storytelling of feminist history. The essay concludes with a brief illumination of political reverberations of subjectless critique in this increasingly post-critical times.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0