메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ko Ryoung-Eun (Department of Critical Care Medicine Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medic) Kwon Oyeon (VUNO Seoul Korea.) Cho Kyung-Jae (VUNO Seoul Korea.) Lee Yeon Joo (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongna) Kwon Joon-myoung (Department of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Mediplex Sejong Hospital Incheon Korea.) Park Jinsik (Division of Cardiology Cardiovascular Center Mediplex Sejong Hospital Incheon Korea.) Kim Jung Soo (Division of Critical Care Medicine Department of Hospital Medicine Inha University Hospital Inha Un) Kim Ah Jin (Division of Critical Care Medicine Department of Hospital Medicine Inha University Hospital Inha Un) Jo You Hwan (Department of Emergency Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Korea.) Lee Yeha (VUNO Seoul Korea.) Jeon Kyeongman (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center Sung)
저널정보
대한의학회 Journal of Korean Medical Science Journal of Korean Medical Science Vol.37 No.16
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
1 - 11 (11page)
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e122

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is suggested to use for screening patients with a high risk of clinical deterioration in the general wards, which could simply be regarded as a general early warning score. However, comparison of unselected admissions to highlight the benefits of introducing qSOFA in hospitals already using Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) remains unclear. We sought to compare qSOFA with MEWS for predicting clinical deterioration in general ward patients regardless of suspected infection. Methods: The predictive performance of qSOFA and MEWS for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) transfer was compared with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis using the databases of vital signs collected from consecutive hospitalized adult patients over 12 months in five participating hospitals in Korea. Results: Of 173,057 hospitalized patients included for analysis, 668 (0.39%) experienced the composite outcome. The discrimination for the composite outcome for MEWS (AUC, 0.777; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.770?0.781) was higher than that for qSOFA (AUC, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.676?0.686; P < 0.001). In addition, MEWS was better for prediction of IHCA (AUC, 0.792; 95% CI, 0.781?0.795 vs. AUC, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.625?0.645; P < 0.001) and unexpected ICU transfer (AUC, 0.767; 95% CI, 0.760?0.773 vs. AUC, 0.716; 95% CI, 0.707?0.718; P < 0.001) than qSOFA. Using the MEWS at a cutoff of ≥ 5 would correctly reclassify 3.7% of patients from qSOFA score ≥ 2. Most patients met MEWS ≥ 5 criteria 13 hours before the composite outcome compared with 11 hours for qSOFA score ≥ 2. Conclusion: MEWS is more accurate that qSOFA score for predicting IHCA or unexpected ICU transfer in patients outside the ICU. Our study suggests that qSOFA should not replace MEWS for identifying patients in the general wards at risk of poor outcome.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0