메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hiroko Machida (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tokai University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan) Koji Matsuo (Division of Gynecologic Oncology Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Southern Ca) Koji Oba (Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan) Daisuke Aoki (Keio University School of Medicine) Takayuki Enomoto (Niigata University School of Medicine Niigata Japan) Aikou Okamoto (The Jikei University School of Medicine) Hidetaka Katabuchi (Faculty of Life Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan) Satoru Nagase (Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine) Masaki Mandai (Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine) Nobuo Yaegashi (Tohoku University School of Medicine) Wataru Yamagami (Keio University School of Medicine) Mikio Mikami (Tokai University School of Medicine)
저널정보
대한부인종양학회 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.33 No.1
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
1 - 17 (17page)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e3

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: Associations between hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes for women with 3 types of gynecologic malignancies, and the trends and contributing factors for high-volume centers were examined. Methods: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology tumor registry databased retrospective study examined 206,845 women with 80,741, 73,647, and 52,457 of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumor, respectively, who underwent primary treatment in Japan between 2004 and 2015. Associations between the annual treatment volume and overall survival (OS) for each tumor type were examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into 3 groups (low- , moderate-, and high-volume centers) based on hazard risks. Results: Hazard ratio (HR) for OS each the 3 tumors decreased with hospital treatment volume. The cut-off points of treatment volume were defined for high- (≥50, ≥51, and ≥27), moderate- (20?49, 20?50, and 17?26), and low-volume centers (≤19, ≤19, and ≤16) by cases/ year for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, rare tumor histology, and initial surgical management as contributing factors for women at high-volume centers (all, p<0.001). The proportion of high-volume center treatments decreased, whereas low-volume center treatments increased (all p<0.001). Treatment at high-volume centers improved OS than that at other centers (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.78?0.88; aHR=0.78, 95% CI=0.75?0.83; and1/17SynopsisFor women with gynecologic malignancy, hospital treatment volume had an impact on survival outcome. The practice pattern shifted with scattering of patients and treatments at high-volume centers were decreasing. High-volume centers in Japan were associated with improved overall survival of gynecologic malignancies. Hospital treatment volume and survivalaHR=0.90, 95% CI=0.86?0.95 for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors). Conclusion: Hospital treatment volume impacted survival outcomes. Treatments at high- volume centers conferred survival benefits for women with gynecologic malignancies. The proportion of treatments at high-volume centers have been decreasing recently.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0