지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As arbitration is widely used as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, third-party funding, which is a person or entity with no prior interest in the legal dispute providing non-recourse financing for one of the parties, has become more prevalent with increasing costs of international arbitration. In particular, Hong Kong and Singapore are the first jurisdictions to adopt and implement legislations to specifically permit third-party funding of international arbitration. Thus, in this article, relevant issues with respect to third-party funding of arbitration, such as, conflicts of interest, disclosure, privilege and confidentiality of information, cost allocation, security for costs, and control over arbitral proceedings by the third-party funder are examined with pertinent provisions of the recent legislations. While the respective legislations of Hong Kong and Singapore may not directly address every issue raised by third-party funding of arbitration, as they make it clear that such is no longer prohibited by the old common law doctrines of champerty and maintenance, they have clarified conflicting case law as well as proactively promoted themselves as leading seats of international arbitration.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub
중재연구
2016 .01
-
The Language of Arbitration Agreements and Availability of Class Arbitration: Focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela Decision
중재연구
2021 .09
-
한국 중재산업 발전 방안
중재연구
2018 .01
-
중재 활성화를 위한 중재비용 구조제도의도입 방안 연구 - 민사소송법상 소송구조에 착안하여 -
중재연구
2024 .03
-
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under England Arbitration Act
중재연구
2021 .09
-
A Study on the Amended Arbitration Law of Mongolia
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Korean case analysis of compelling arbitration in the United States
중재연구
2018 .01
-
An Attempt to Sidestep Regulatory Supervision? – Increasing Arbitration of Public Law Matters in Korea and an Emerging Structural Tension
Journal of Korean Law
2024 .08
-
Navigating the Digital Maze - Pertinent Issues in E‐Arbitration
중재연구
2017 .01
-
中国国际商事仲裁协议效力认定问题研究
중재연구
2018 .01
-
Abuse of Process and Regulation in Commercial Arbitration – A Chinese Perspective
중재연구
2015 .01
-
영국중재법상 해사중재와 관련된 LMAA 중재의 시사점에 관한 연구
해양비즈니스
2018 .01
-
Research on the Expansion of the Effect of Arbitration Agreements in China
중재연구
2024 .09
-
중국 중재제도의 새로운 발전과 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
-
중재법 개정과 환경분쟁 조정법상 중재의 활성화를 위한 고찰
국제법무
2019 .01
-
Investigation on the Current Situation of China's Internet Arbitration and Suggestions for its Perfection
중국법연구
2019 .01
-
A Study on the Development of the Arbitration System based on the Prosecution and Police Investigation Mediation Right
중재연구
2018 .01
-
중국 중재제도에 관한 고찰- 중국 상해자유무역지역의 신중재규칙을 중심으로 -
무역연구
2015 .01
-
중재산업진흥법의 주요내용과 발전적 운용
중재연구
2017 .01
-
ARBITRATION AND ADR, COMPONENTS OF THE NEW PARADIGM OF THE JUSTICE IN THE MODERNITY
국제거래와 법
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0