지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Maximilien Robespierre appeared as a believer in private or passiveliberty in the National Assembly from the beginning of the Revolution.
He was a pure liberalist in that he argued for unconditional andabsolute liberty of religion, of press, of expression and of human body.
But, at the same time, by defending sovereignty and liberty of peoplesuch as political rights and right of arms in opposition to the king’spower of veto, M. Robespierre also appeared as an advocate of publicor active liberty. He was almost the only revolutionary leader whotried to realize the two liberties at the same time.
However, because the people was infected with the mentality ofOld Regime that took for granted the domination-subordination, hethought it necessary to enlighten the right and duty in people’s heart.
That’s why he advocated the politics of virtue.
The feasibility of his thought was put to verification when heacquired political power in entering the Committee of Public Safety.
M. Robespierre endeavored to explain the Terror by incorporating itin his democratic theory. So the Terror, by being identified withjustice, was placed in his theory as a means of safeguarding theliberty. By doing so, he combined the Politics of Virtue and theTerror as the means for realization of liberty. But he placed anemphasis on the Politics of Virtue as we saw in the Festival ofSupreme Being.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0