메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김진성 (삼성서울병원) 주상규 (삼성서울병원) 홍채선 (삼성서울병원) 정재원 (인피니트 헬스케어 연구개발부) 손기홍 (삼성서울병원) 신정석 (삼성서울병원) 신은혁 (삼성서울병원) 안성환 (삼성서울병원) 한영이 (성균관대학교) 최두호 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
한국의학물리학회 의학물리 의학물리 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
85 - 91 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
At present, megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) is the only method used to correct the position oftomotherapy patients. MVCT produces extra radiation, in addition to the radiation used for treatment, andrepositioning also takes up much of the total treatment time. To address these issues, we suggest the use ofa video image?guided setup (VIGS) system for correcting the position of tomotherapy patients. We developedan in-house program to correct the exact position of patients using two orthogonal images obtained from twovideo cameras installed at 90º and fastened inside the tomotherapy gantry. The system is programmed to makeautomatic registration possible with the use of edge detection of the user-defined region of interest (ROI). Ahead-and-neck patient is then simulated using a humanoid phantom. After taking the computed tomography(CT) image, tomotherapy planning is performed. To mimic a clinical treatment course, we used an immobilizationdevice to position the phantom on the tomotherapy couch and, using MVCT, corrected its position to matchthe one captured when the treatment was planned. Video images of the corrected position were used as referenceimages for the VIGS system. First, the position was repeatedly corrected 10 times using MVCT, and based onthe saved reference video image, the patient position was then corrected 10 times using the VIGS method. Thereafter, the results of the two correction methods were compared. The results demonstrated that patientpositioning using a video-imaging method (41.7±11.2 seconds) significantly reduces the overall time of the MVCTmethod (420±6 seconds) (p<0.05). However, there was no meaningful difference in accuracy between the twomethods (x=0.11 mm, y=0.27 mm, z=0.58 mm, p>0.05). Because VIGS provides a more accurate result andreduces the required time, compared with the MVCT method, it is expected to manage the overall tomotherapytreatment process more efficiently.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0