지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the vocabulary used in the presidential candidates debate, will illuminate the major issues and problems of our society and the political perspective of each candidate. To this end, I investigate the high-frequency vocabulary in the 18 presidential candidates debate. In order to analyze the data, words of the political area are one of the most heavily within the entire vocabulary words. Also discuss the specific incident or subject to debate, the economic zone, ‘jobs’ and ‘economic democracy’, the social field, the ‘welfare’ and ‘childcare’, ‘pension’, ‘medical treatment’ representative. To view a candidate’s political views and attitudes, I analyze words with the meaning of the [Emotion], [Attitude] and [Rating]. And words are divided into individual words and common words, individual words here shows the difference between the inclination of the candidates. In particular, the analysis shows what the qualities and roles of each candidate for the president to emphasize. As well as the results show what each candidate with the political direction and purpose.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0