메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Michael Aung-Thwin (University of Hawai’i at Manoa)
저널정보
서강대학교 동아연구소 TRaNS(Trans –Regional and –National Studies of Southeast Asia) TRaNS(Trans –Regional and –National Studies of Southeast Asia) Vol.1 No.1
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
87 - 104 (18page)
DOI
10.1017/trn.2012.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘Trends’ in the field ofSoutheast Asian history have a way ofbeing unresolved satisfactorily before ‘new’ ones emerge to take their place. Part of the reason is that older scholarship is not only considered passe, but each new generation ofSoutheast Asianists wants to ‘make its mark’ on the field in original ways. Yet, when one scrutinizes some ofthese ‘new’ issues carefully, they often turn out not to be entirely so; rather, they appear to be different ways of approaching and/or expressing older ones, using different (and more current) operating vocabulary. ‘Angle of vision’ and ‘perspective’, popular in the 1960s, have become ‘privileging of’ or ‘giving agency to’ in current usage, while their methodological intent is exactly the same, bearing the same (or nearly the same) desirable consequences. Older, seminal scholarship is often only given lip-service without much in-depth consideration, so that some ofthe ‘new’ scholarship begins ‘in the middle of the game’, scarcely acknowledging (or knowing) what had transpired earlier. This unawareness regarding the ‘lineage’ of Southeast Asia scholarship fosters some reinvention and repetition of issues and problems without realizing it, in turn protracting their resolution. So as not to lose sight ofthis ‘scholarly lineage’ that not only allows a better assessment ofwhat are genuinely new trends and what are not, but also to resolve unresolved issues and move on to really new things, this essay will analyse and discuss where the field of Southeast Asian history has been, where it is currently, and where it might be headed. Although focused on the discipline of history, it remains ensconced within the context of the larger field ofSoutheast Asian studies.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (80)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0