지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.105 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2023.9
- 수록면
- 133 - 140 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Studies have yielded contradictory results on whether donor sex and donor-recipient sex disparity affect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The present study assessed whether donor sex or donor-recipient sex disparity affects HCC recurrence after LDLT at a high-volume center.
Methods: This study included 772 HCC patients who underwent LDLT between January 2006 and December 2015 at Asan Medical Center. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the sex of the donor and recipient: male-to-male (n = 490, 63.5%), male-to-female (n = 75, 9.7%), female-to-male (n = 170, 22.0%), and female-to-female (n = 37, 4.8%).
Results: Disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.372) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.591) did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. DFS also did not differ significantly between LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.792) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.084). After patient matching with an α-FP/des-γ-carboxy prothrombin/tumor volume score cutoff of 5logs, donor-recipient sex disparity did not significantly affect DFS (P = 0.598) or OS (P = 0.777). There were also no differences in DFS in matched LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.312) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.374).
Conclusion: Neither donor sex nor donor-recipient sex disparity significantly affected posttransplant HCC recurrence.
Methods: This study included 772 HCC patients who underwent LDLT between January 2006 and December 2015 at Asan Medical Center. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the sex of the donor and recipient: male-to-male (n = 490, 63.5%), male-to-female (n = 75, 9.7%), female-to-male (n = 170, 22.0%), and female-to-female (n = 37, 4.8%).
Results: Disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.372) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.591) did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. DFS also did not differ significantly between LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.792) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.084). After patient matching with an α-FP/des-γ-carboxy prothrombin/tumor volume score cutoff of 5logs, donor-recipient sex disparity did not significantly affect DFS (P = 0.598) or OS (P = 0.777). There were also no differences in DFS in matched LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.312) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.374).
Conclusion: Neither donor sex nor donor-recipient sex disparity significantly affected posttransplant HCC recurrence.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Living donor liver transplantation using donors older than 50 years of age: Recipient criteria and donor risk
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
The outcomes of marginal donor hearts compared with ideal donors: a single-center experience in Iran
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2022 .06
-
Impact of extended living donor criteria focusing on donor safety in living donor liver transplantation
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
생체간이식에 관한 공여자 합병증
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2017 .01
-
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma from living-donor vs. deceased donor
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation from elderly donors
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2021 .01
-
MMPI-2를 이용한 생체 간 공여자들의 심리적 특성에 대한 연구
정신신체의학
2019 .01
-
Recipient efficacy and safety of kidney transplantation from older living donor: consideration for using older kidney as a solution to the shortage of organs
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2021 .12
-
Weight reduction of the donor in hepatic steatosis for living donor liver transplantation as a tool in expanding the donor pool
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Donor wound satisfaction after living donor liver transplantation in the Era of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Diaphragmatic herniation following donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation : a serious complication not given due recognition
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2017 .11
-
Outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation from elderly donors
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
The Need for New Donor Stratification to Predict Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation
Yonsei Medical Journal
2017 .01
-
Can the bone marrow harvest volume be reduced safely in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with pediatric sibling donors?
Blood Research
2023 .03
-
Donor Surgical Morbidity in Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplant: A Portuguese Experience
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
2021 .11
-
Management of potential cardiac donors
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2024 .03
-
How far can we go on donor selection : age and volume
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2017 .03
-
[Vascular Surgery/ Transplantation] Cysteine as a Potential Donor Urinary Biomarker for Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Recipient Early Graft Function
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .05
-
Institutional standard framework and experience of living donor liver transplantation for overseas non-Korean patients at Asan Medical Center
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2021 .01
-
Comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms and short tandem repeats as markers for differentiating between donors and recipients in solid organ transplantation
Clinical Transplantation and Research
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088100747