지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제53호
- 발행연도
- 2023.10
- 수록면
- 246 - 270 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2023.10.53.246
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article focuses on recent advancements in Bible translation, using the Dutch Nieuwe Bijbelvertaling (NBV) as a case study. The NBV was published in 2004 and underwent a revision in 2021. This translation follows the tradition of Nida, but also aims to enhance the method of functional equivalence with innovative elements. The 2021 edition incorporates valuable feedback from readers to improve the translation according to its own standards and draws insights from skopos theory to address various dilemma’s. Consequently, the NBV exemplifies the contemporary stance of Bible translation that emphasizes methodological improvements and acknowledges the additional perspective of skopos theory. However, it still predominantly adheres to the view of translation as a solely linguistic endeavor and remains within the paradigm of translation as a transfer process.
Within the field of translation studies, the transfer paradigm has been under scrutiny for several decades. A more current paradigm (frames paradigm) recognizes that translation inherently involves a reconceptualization of the source text influenced by various factors and frames of reference. Furthermore, the translator not only reconceptualizes the source text but also envisions a particular concept of the target text. Embracing these insights entails recognizing that translation is not a straightforward transfer but is rooted in interpretative processes. While glimpses of these insights were evident in the NBV project, the translators at the time were not fully aware of the implications.
Bible translators and their organizations tend to present their translations within the framework of the transfer paradigm, conforming to the audience expectations and adhering to the traditional view of translation as reproduction of the same text in new words. However, according to the frames paradigm, the relationship between source text and translation is less direct. A translation can be seen as a contemporary representation of an existing text, fundamentally aligned with the source text but also displaying distinct variations. Translation inherently embodies a certain duality. The current scholarly view of translation does not necessarily conflict with a Christian perspective on Scripture: a translation can be viewed not only as a representation of the source text but also as a recontextualization of the eternal Word.
Within the field of translation studies, the transfer paradigm has been under scrutiny for several decades. A more current paradigm (frames paradigm) recognizes that translation inherently involves a reconceptualization of the source text influenced by various factors and frames of reference. Furthermore, the translator not only reconceptualizes the source text but also envisions a particular concept of the target text. Embracing these insights entails recognizing that translation is not a straightforward transfer but is rooted in interpretative processes. While glimpses of these insights were evident in the NBV project, the translators at the time were not fully aware of the implications.
Bible translators and their organizations tend to present their translations within the framework of the transfer paradigm, conforming to the audience expectations and adhering to the traditional view of translation as reproduction of the same text in new words. However, according to the frames paradigm, the relationship between source text and translation is less direct. A translation can be seen as a contemporary representation of an existing text, fundamentally aligned with the source text but also displaying distinct variations. Translation inherently embodies a certain duality. The current scholarly view of translation does not necessarily conflict with a Christian perspective on Scripture: a translation can be viewed not only as a representation of the source text but also as a recontextualization of the eternal Word.
목차
1. Translation as a linguistic activity
2. Functional equivalence renewed: the case of the NBV
3. Progress and difficulties
4. Reception and revision of the NBV
5. Skopos as an additional perspective
6. New insights from translation studies
7. Bible translation between two paradigms
8. Conclusions
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
번역학 연구에서 다중 번역 텍스트의 활용을 위한 방안
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
중국 고대 역장(驛場)제도에 대한 고찰- 번역의 시스템과 방법을 중심으로-
언어학연구
2017 .01
-
테크놀로지 패러다임에서의 번역능력 재조명
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
Differing Perspectives on Translation: A Brief History & Overview
통번역교육연구
2018 .01
-
한영 법령 번역 품질 제고를 위한 번역 방식에 관한 소고 ?직역 문제를 중심으로?
통역과 번역
2022 .04
-
번역공학적 이성 비판: 디지털 시대 번역학의 과제
번역학연구
2020 .10
-
미국, 유럽, 중국, 캐나다, ISO 번역 표준에 관한 복수사례연구
번역학연구
2015 .06
-
기계번역·인간번역·트랜스크리에이션의 문체 비교: 광고 번역을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
번역사(飜譯史)와 번역사 연구의 개념
T&I REVIEW
2016 .06
-
번역과정과 문화적 차이에 대한 고찰: 번역실례를 중심으로
통번역교육연구
2016 .01
-
번역과정에 있어서의 번역브리프와 번역결정- 다국어사전 구축 번역에 대한 사례연구
통역과 번역
2016 .01
-
인공지능 번역 시스템의 출현에 대한 소고
번역학연구
2017 .12
-
A Suggestion on Artificial Intelligence and Translation Education
통번역교육연구
2021 .11
-
역(逆)번역을 활용한 문학번역 교육 - 신경숙의 『엄마를 부탁해』의 한국어↔스페인어 번역을 중심으로
스페인어문학
2019 .01
-
기계번역에서 이중주어 구문의 한영 번역 양상- 구글 번역과 네이버 파파고의 법조문 번역 사례 비교 -
T&I REVIEW
2022 .06
-
다자(多者) 수행 번역의 문제점 및 번역 교육 현황에 관한 고찰- 일관성의 관점에서
통역과 번역
2015 .01
-
한국영화 번역 시스템의 문제점과 개선 방향
번역학연구
2020 .12
-
일한기계번역의 오류유형에 관한 고찰-일본소설을 중심으로-
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
-
한국의 공공기관, 출판업계, 번역학계의 번역언어 연구
번역학연구
2015 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0