지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.9
- 수록면
- 123 - 136 (14page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) causes a chronic and progressive granulomatous enteritis and economic losses in dairy cattle in subclinical stages. Subclinical infection in cattle can be detected using serum MAP antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.
Objectives: To investigate the differences in blood parameters, according to the detection of MAP using serum antibody ELISA and fecal PCR tests.
Methods: We divided 33 subclinically infected adult cattle into three groups: seronegative and fecal-positive (SNFP, n = 5), seropositive and fecal-negative (SPFN, n = 10), and seropositive and fecal-positive (SPFP, n = 18). Hematological and serum biochemical analyses were performed.
Results: Although the cows were clinically healthy without any manifestations, the SNFP and SPFP groups had higher platelet counts, mean platelet volumes, plateletcrit, lactate dehydrogenase levels, lactate levels, and calcium levels but lower mean corpuscular volume concentration than the SPFN group (p < 0.017). The red blood cell count, hematocrit, monocyte count, glucose level, and calprotectin level were different according to the detection method (p < 0.05). The SNFP and SPFP groups had higher red blood cell counts, hematocrit and calprotectin levels, but lower monocyte counts and glucose levels than the SPFN group, although there were no significant differences (p > 0.017).
Conclusions: The cows with fecal-positive MAP status had different blood parameters from those with fecal-negative MAP status, although they were subclinically infected. These findings provide new insights into understanding the mechanism of MAP infection in subclinically infected cattle.
Objectives: To investigate the differences in blood parameters, according to the detection of MAP using serum antibody ELISA and fecal PCR tests.
Methods: We divided 33 subclinically infected adult cattle into three groups: seronegative and fecal-positive (SNFP, n = 5), seropositive and fecal-negative (SPFN, n = 10), and seropositive and fecal-positive (SPFP, n = 18). Hematological and serum biochemical analyses were performed.
Results: Although the cows were clinically healthy without any manifestations, the SNFP and SPFP groups had higher platelet counts, mean platelet volumes, plateletcrit, lactate dehydrogenase levels, lactate levels, and calcium levels but lower mean corpuscular volume concentration than the SPFN group (p < 0.017). The red blood cell count, hematocrit, monocyte count, glucose level, and calprotectin level were different according to the detection method (p < 0.05). The SNFP and SPFP groups had higher red blood cell counts, hematocrit and calprotectin levels, but lower monocyte counts and glucose levels than the SPFN group, although there were no significant differences (p > 0.017).
Conclusions: The cows with fecal-positive MAP status had different blood parameters from those with fecal-negative MAP status, although they were subclinically infected. These findings provide new insights into understanding the mechanism of MAP infection in subclinically infected cattle.
목차
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparative analysis of serological tests and fecal detection in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research(대한수의학회지)
2020 .09
-
Usefulness of fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin for detection of active ulcerative colitis
Intestinal research
2018 .01
-
장질환에 있어서 Fecal Calprotectin의 적절한 사용
대한내과학회지
2018 .01
-
제주지역 한우의 요네병 감염실태 조사
한국가축위생학회지
2015 .01
-
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis 감염 초기 개체 검출을 위한 항원 탐색 및 특성 분석
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research(대한수의학회지)
2015 .06
-
Fecal Immunochemical Test and Fecal Calprotectin Measurement Are Noninvasive Monitoring Tools for Predicting Endoscopic Activity in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
Gut and Liver
2018 .01
-
Clinical Significance of Fecal Lactoferrin and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients with Acute Diarrhea
Gut and Liver
2015 .01
-
Gene Expression Profiles of Th1-type Chemokines in Whole Blood of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis-Infected Cattle
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY AND VIROLOGY
2018 .12
-
Optimal Cutoff Level of Fecal Calprotectin for Detecting Small Bowel Inflammation in Crohn's Disease
Gut and Liver
2021 .09
-
The role of fecal calprotectin in pediatric disease
Korean journal of pediatrics
2019 .01
-
Factors Predicting Fecal Occult Blood Testing among Residents of Bushehr, Iran, Based on the Health Belief Model
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
-
Correlation of fecal calprotectin and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with ulcerative colitis
Intestinal research
2022 .04
-
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile 감염에서 대변 Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin과 Calprotectin의 생물학적 표지자로서의 임상적 유용성
Laboratory Medicine Online
2020 .01
-
Annual Report of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service on Routine Hematology (2018)
Journal of Laboratory Medicine And Quality Assurance
2019 .01
-
Fecal Calprotectin in Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple System Atrophy
Journal Of Movement Disorders
2022 .05
-
Current status of intestinal parasite infections in fecal samples of dogs in Korea
Parasites, Hosts and Diseases
2024 .11
-
Overview: Pediatric Fecal Incontinence
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Combination of leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein and fecal markers detect Crohn’s disease activity confirmed by balloon-assisted enteroscopy
Intestinal research
2024 .01
-
Accuracy of three different fecal calprotectin tests in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease
Intestinal research
2016 .01
-
[Clinical Pathology] Comparison of the bovine blood gas parameters produced with three types of portable blood gas analyzers
Journal of Veterinary Science
2022 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088230857