인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
This article is to analyze the regulations on a bank ownership under the Bank Act in Korea and to suggest some improvements in respect of legal issues and financial policy matters. Also, this paper reviews the history of regulations of a bank ownership since 1950 when the Bank Act was enacted. The core issue on the bank ownership regulation under the Bank Act is whether a non-financial firm group should be permitted to control a bank, and further, if permitted, how much such ownership should be allowed. Until the amendment of the Bank Act in June 2009 (effective in October 2009), a strict policy on bank ownership by a non-financial group had been taken. However, the 2009 Bank Act amendments allowed a non-financial group to own up to 9% of voting shares of a nationwide commercial bank, increasing from the previous 4% limit, although an approval from a financial regulator should be obtained if such ownership triggers certain conditions. However, this financial policy deregulating the bank ownership restrictions is evaluated not to be desirable in that such policy might incur the negative effects, including that such a non-financial group might abuse its power as a large shareholder, exercise undue influences on the bank, and eventually harm the soundness of the bank as well as the sound financial system. Alternatively, other methods to improve the competitiveness of the bank industry (According to the Government, the improvement of the banks' competitiveness is one of the aims to deregulate the bank ownership restrictions.), may be considered: expanding the scope of bank activities, improving the corporate governance of a bank, and abolishing unnecessary regulations or deregulating strict regulations imposed on banks. Another issue to note is that the control on a bank by a private equity fund ("PEF") should be prohibited in that such PEF in nature seeks to gain profits in the short-term rather than in the long-term, considering that long-term strategies and investments (such as information technology investments) are essential to banking institutions.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089356510
