메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박명준 (한국노동연구원)
저널정보
참여연대 참여사회연구소 시민과세계 시민과세계 통권 제43호
발행연도
2023.12
수록면
1 - 36 (36page)
DOI
10.35548/cw.2023.12.43.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The success of social dialogue as part of the policy-making process requires a ‘multifaceted politics of co-ordination’. Social dialogue requires a more careful and complex coordination of interests in a country like Korea, which has a strong presidential system; a relatively low level of parliamentary institutionalization; as well as low organizational concentration of interest groups, especially trade unions, Through the concept of “coordination politics” and by identifying the critical spots of coordination politics in the Korean experience, this study attempts to explain the failure of social grand compromise in Korea as well as to reflex the the previous interpretation. It can be analyzed by dividing political society (the administrative branch and the National Assembly) and civil society (labour and management interest groups) on the one hand, and the process of signing as well as the implementation of social agreements on the other. This study conceptualizes each of them as political support, social support, political acceptance, and social acceptance, and diagnoses the difficulties or failures of coordination at each point. In doing so, it aims to highlight the unintended consequences of coordination failures in the pursuit of social pacts and participation in social dialogue institutions under Korean conditions. It has been a constant and recurrent phenomenon within social dialogue as a new policy experiment and an attempt to reroute the politics of interests, which validates both the traditional neo-corporatist theories as well as the new theorizations since the 1990s. By highlighting the crucial points of coordination politics, we can understand the areas of policy-understanding coordination that need to be carefully examined in the Korean case and the practical necessity of actors" genuine strategic choice of actions in these areas. This interpretation highlights the crucial aspects of the phenomena in Korea that have been overlooked by the existing strategicist explanations and allows for a new hermeneutic.

목차

1. 서론
2. 기존연구 한계, 이론적 문제의식, 분석틀
3. 분석(1): 보수정부 하에서의 사회적 타협 시도들
4. 분석(2): 진보정부 하에서의 사회적 타협 시도들
5. 논의: 발견점과 시사점
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089245389