메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Oh, Il Young (IUCN World Headquarters) Jang, Myeong Jin (Sookmyung Women’s University) Yeo, Yeongjun (Sookmyung Women’s University) Ahn, Young-Hwan (Sookmyung Women’s University)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.14 No.6-1
발행연도
2023.12
수록면
651 - 671 (21page)
DOI
10.15531/KSCCR.2023.14.6.651

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The South Korean government delineated carbon-neutral scenarios for the road transport sector in 2021, envisioning a more than 97% transition to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) by 2050. This study employs the Model for Energy Transition and Emission Reduction to examine changes in vehicle types, greenhouse gas emissions, and economic costs in the road transport sector until 2050. A comparison between the carbon-neutral (CN) and business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios, maintaining current policy levels, is conducted to derive policy implications. The attainment of carbon neutrality in the road transport sector hinges significantly on the widespread adoption of BEVs and FCEVs, with a crucial policy to ban the sales of internal combustion engine vehicle by the 2030s. A comparison of the two scenarios highlights the significant differences in the choice of BEVs and FCEVs between the non-business and business sectors. The direct costs, encompassing investment, operating, and fuel costs, are higher in the CN scenario than in the BAU scenario. However, when external costs related to greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle travel are factored in using carbon and vehicle miles traveled taxes, the total costs of the CN scenario are lower than those of the BAU scenario. Analyzing its economic viability by incorporating external costs enhances the policy’s feasibility of achieving carbon neutrality.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Literature review
3. Methods and data
4. Results
5. Policy implications
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089314138