Humanities
Social science
Natural science
Engineering
Medical science
Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
General Social Science
Business Management
Tourism
Education
Military Science
Library and Information Science
Law
Sociology
Journalism and Media Studies
Psychological Science
Political Science and Diplomacy
Geography
Public Administration
Economics
International Trade
Anthropology
Other Social Science
General Natural Science
Physics
Biology
Life Sciences
Mathematics/Statistics
Astronomy
Earth Science
Chemistry
Other Natural Science
General Engineering
Architectural Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial Engineering
Material/Energy Engineering
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Marine and Ocean Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Computer Science
Other Engineering
General Medical Science
Nursing Science
Veterinary
Pharmacy
Traditional Korean Medicine
Basic Medicine
Clinical Medicine
Other Medicine
General Agriculture and Fishery
Agriculture
Fishery Science
Food Science
Forestry
Animal Husbandry
Marine Transportation Studies
Other Agriculture and Fishery
DBpia AI
AI agent
AI idea
AI Reader
AI Viewer
Citeasy
Chrome Library Management Down
Akaroot
DBpia provides support to continue researcher activities such as academic research/group support/education.
Community
It is a networking space where researchers can widely promote their work and expertise, and create opportunities for new collaborations.
논문 기본 정보
- Type
- Academic journal
- Author
- Journal
- 한국일본근대학회 일본근대학연구 일본근대학연구 제81호
- Published
- 2023.8
- Pages
- 239 - 258 (20page)
Usage
Abstract· Keywords
This study conducted an analysis on the results of Japan’s quantitative easing policy, which has lasted for more than 10 years. To this end, a comprehensive review was conducted using data that could understand the impact of quantitative easing policies on the macroeconomy, households, companies, and the government.
The results of the study are as follows. First of all, in the case of macro indicators, only two years in 2013 and 2021 have achieved Abenomics’ main goal of 2% real GDP growth during the 2013-2022 period, and only one year in 2013 has achieved significant real GDP growth, considering that 2020 is a rebound from the 2019 decline. In the case of households, the real wage index continued to fall during the 2013-2022 period, while the consumer price index increased, indicating that the household economy contracted. On the corporate side, the facility investment plan of companies with a capital of more than 100 million yen increased during the 2013-2022 period, while the corporate survey index of mid- and small-sized companies showed a decreasing trend. In particular, in the case of small and medium-sized enterprises, the economy was judged negatively during the period of 2013 to 2022, excluding the first quarter of 2014. In the case of the government, 22.6% of Japan’s expenditure was accounted for by government bonds and 34.3% of its revenue was accounted for by public bonds as of 2022. As a result, Japan’s total general government debt reached 1,547 trillion yen in 2022, indicating that the Japanese government’s fiscal soundness has deteriorated significantly due to quantitative easing that has lasted for more than a decade.
This study is of policy and academic significance to analyze the effectiveness and side effects of the policy, focusing on Japan’s quantitative easing policy, which has been implemented in the mid- to long-term since the 2000s. In addition, the method of analyzing not only macroeconomic indicators but also indicators that can grasp the economy of households, companies, and the government can be used as a useful research method.
#양적완화
#일본경제
#경제3주체
#아베노믹스
#금리
#Quantitative Easing
#Japan’s Economy
#The Three Main Economic Players
#Abenomics
#Interest Rates
Update DetailsIf the title, authors, table of contents,or page range is incorrect, please let us know!
Contents
No content found
References
Add ReferencesRecently viewed articles
